期刊文献+

社会责任报告及鉴证能否传递有效信号?——基于企业声誉理论的分析 被引量:194

Can Corporate Social Report and Assurance Be Effective Signals——An analysis based on reputation theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文依托企业声誉理论,以我国2008—2009年间沪深两市非ST上市公司为样本,通过检验企业社会责任报告及鉴证对社会责任表现与企业声誉两者关系的影响,分析我国企业社会责任报告及鉴证的信号传递作用。研究发现:企业社会责任表现能提升企业声誉;企业社会责任报告能有效传递社会责任表现的信息,增强社会责任表现与企业声誉之间的正向关系;企业社会责任报告鉴证并没有显著促进社会责任表现对企业声誉的作用。本文的研究结果显示,我国现有的企业社会责任报告鉴证尚无法提高企业社会责任表现和社会责任报告的可信度。本文最后对改善我国企业社会责任报告鉴证的质量提出了建议。 This paper explores the signaling effect of corporate social report and assurance based on reputation theory. The empirical analysis of the impact of corporate social report and assurance on the relationship between social performance and reputation of listed firms in China shows that: corporate social performance can improve corporate reputation, corporate social report can signal corporate social performance, and assurance on corporate social report plays no role in the relationship between social performance and reputation. The findings suggest that the existing assurance on corporate social report in China can not reach the objective of improving the creditability of social performance and social report. The paper concludes by some suggestions for improvement of assurance on corporate social report.
出处 《审计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期87-93,共7页 Auditing Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"社会责任对企业价值影响的机理与测试研究"(项目批准号:70972080) "社会环境信息披露决策机制研究"(项目批准号:71072125)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 社会责任报告 鉴证 企业社会责任表现 企业声誉 social report, assurance, corporate social performance, corporate reputation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1皮天雷.国外声誉理论:文献综述、研究展望及对中国的启示[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2009,11(3):95-101. 被引量:38
  • 2沈洪涛,万拓,杨思琴.我国企业社会责任报告鉴证的现状及评价[J].审计与经济研究,2010,25(6):68-74. 被引量:70
  • 3杨海燕,许家林.企业社会责任报告第三方审验主要标准述评[J].证券市场导报,2009(12):60-65. 被引量:30
  • 4Cooper, S. M., and D. L. Owen. 2007. Corporate Social Reporting and Stakeholder Accountability: The Missing Link[J]. Accounting Organizations and Society, 32: 649-667.
  • 5Deegan, C., B. Cooper, and M. Shelly. 2005. An Investigation of TBL Report Assurance Statements: Australian Evidence[J]. Australian Accountine Review.
  • 6Fombrun, C. 1998. Indices of Corporate Reputation: An Analysis of Media Rankings and Social Monitors' Ratings[J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(4): 327-340.
  • 7Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(2): 233-258.
  • 8Hooghiemstra, R. 2000. Corporate Communication and Impression Management: New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1): 55-68.
  • 9O'Dwyer, B., and D. L. Owen. 2005. Assurance Statement Practice in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting: a Critical Evaluation[J]. The British Accounting Review, 37(2): 205-229.
  • 10Siltaoja, M. 2006. Value Priorities as Combining Core Factors Between CSR and Reputation - A Qualitative Study[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1): 91-111.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Kreps D, Wilson. Reputation and Information [ J ]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982, (27) :253 - 279.
  • 2Fama E. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm[ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, (88) :288 -307.
  • 3Holmstrom B. Managerial Incentive Problems: a Dynamic Perspective [ J ]. Review of Economic Studies, 1999, (66) : 169 - 82.
  • 4Kreps D, P Milgrom, Roberts, R Wilson. Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisons Dilemma[ J ]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982, (27) :245 -252.
  • 5Kreps D, J Roberts. Predation, Reputation, and Entry Deterrence [ J ]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982 (27) :280 - 312.
  • 6Kandori, M. Social Norm and Community Enforcement [ J ]. Review of Economic Studies, 1992, ( 59 ) :63 - 80.
  • 7Fudenberg D, E Maskin. the Folk Theorem in Repealed Games with Discounting or ith Incomplete Information [ J ]. Econometrica, 1986, (54) : 533 - 556.
  • 8Tadelis S. What's in Name? Reputation as a Tradable Asset [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1999,89 (3) :548 -563.
  • 9Tadelis S. The Market for Reputations as an Incentive Mechanism[ J ]. Journal of Political Economy ,2002,110 (4).
  • 10George J Mailath, Larry Samuelson. Your Reputation is Who You are Not, Not Who You'd Like To be[ J ]. CAREES Working Paper, 1998, 98 (ll).

共引文献117

同被引文献2092

引证文献194

二级引证文献1559

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部