摘要
随着《刑法修正案(八)》的正式实施,对危险驾驶入罪问题,无论在法学界还是在司法界均有不同声音,其中呼声甚高是要求最高人民法院对"醉驾"标准做出相关解释。最近,最高院回音对此将以"指导性案例"的形式下发全国法院参照适用,以统一和规范此类案件的法律适用标准。人们希望案例指导具有接近司法正义、彰显司法理性、整合司法资源等法理价值。
With the formal implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment（VIII）,there are arguments about dangerous driving conviction,both in legal circles and in the judiciary.The strongest voice is to ask the Supreme People＇s Court to explain drunk driving standards.Recently,the Supreme Court has echoed it will be issued to the national courts for application in the form of in order to unify and standardize the application of the law.It is hoped that the case guidance is close to justice,highlight the rational administration of justice,the integration of judicial resources and other legal values.
出处
《连云港职业技术学院学报》
2011年第2期23-27,共5页
Journal of Lianyungang Technical College
关键词
案例指导
理性
命令
case guidance
reason
order
