期刊文献+

死刑民意调查研究 被引量:7

Survey Report on the Death Penalty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,广大民众对死刑的支持仅是一种"感性的"认识。通过实证调查可知,文化水平的高低基本上不会影响人们对死刑支持率的高低,不同职业也基本上不会影响人们对死刑的态度。因此,那种寄希望于将来人们文化水平提高、社会精神文明程度的提高而使人们放弃对死刑支持态度的观点就显得不切实际。切实可行的做法是:以主张限制及废除死刑的学者为先锋,以政府及媒体为主力军,首先从大学生及中小学生入手加大对死刑的宣传力度与广度,使广大民众早日对死刑有一个全面的、正确的认识,从而使"民意"不再成为我国废除死刑道路上的障碍。 At present, broad public support for capital punishment is only a "emotional" aware- ness. The empirical investigation shows, the level of culture, people basically do not affect the level of support for the death penalty, will not affect the different occupations are basically the attitude of the people on the death penalty. Thus, hopes that people will raise the level of culture and social im- provement in the level of spiritual civilization leaving supportive people to give up the view of the death penalty becomes impractical. Practical approach is: to abolish the death penalty in favor of limiting and scholars as the first with the government and the media as the main force, the first starting from the primary and secondary school students and to increase the propaganda and breadth of the death penalty, the death penalty as soon as possible so that the general public have a Comprehensive and correct understanding, so that "public opinion" will not become obstacles on the road to abolishing the death oenaltv.
出处 《时代法学》 CSSCI 2011年第4期59-68,共10页 Presentday Law Science
关键词 感性 死刑 死刑民意 sensibility death penalty death penalty opinion
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1陈兴良.死刑备忘录[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
  • 2高铭暄.略论中国刑法中的死刑替代措施[J].河北法学,2008,26(2):18-21. 被引量:47
  • 3赵秉志.刑法总论[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2008.391.
  • 4薛洪涛.http://www.sina.com.en.2010年9月7日法制周末.

二级参考文献4

共引文献57

同被引文献178

引证文献7

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部