摘要
目的:研究国产5-单硝酸异山梨醇酯(IS-5-MN)胶囊及进口IS-5-MN片剂在健康志愿者的药动学特征及其生物等效性。方法:随机双盲实验先后一次口服IS-5-MN胶囊和进口IS-5-MN参比片剂(20mg)后,以高效气相色谱法时检测其血药浓度,采用CAPP软件包计算药动学参数,并做生物等效性分析。结果:一次口服胶囊和片剂的药动学符合二室开放模型,其主要药动学参数Cmax分别为(477.7±103.9)μg/L和(468.1±107.8)μg/L,Tmax分别为(0.77±0.36)h和(0.84±0.24)h,t1/2β分别为(6.99±0.71)h和(7.02±0.51)h(P>0.05);胶囊的相对生物利用度为(106.1±10.1)%。结论:两种制剂生物等效。
To study the pharmacokinetics of domestic capsules and imported tablets of IS-5-MN in healthy volunteers and to determine the bioequivalence of the drug. METHODS:A single dose of 20 mg of the drug was given in a randomized two-period crossover study. Plasma drug concentration was assayed by GC with capillary columns. The data were processed with CAPP Cpharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic procedure and the bioequivalence was calculated. RESULTS: The concentration-time courses after medication conformed to a two-compartment open model. The Cmax of domestic capsules and imported tablets were (477. 7±103. 9 ) μg/L and (468. 1±107. 8) μg/L respectively; the Tmax of the above two preparations were (0. 77±0. 36 ) h and (0. 84±0. 24) h respectively and their elimination t1/2 were (6. 99±0. 71 ) h and (7. 02±0. 51 ) h respectively. The difference of the main pharmacokinetic parameters between the two formulations was nonsignificant (P> 0. 05 ).The relative bioavalability of domestic capsules vs imported tablets was (106. 1±10. 1) %. CONCLUSION: These two preparations were bioequivalent.
出处
《中国新药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
1999年第12期810-813,共4页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs