摘要
粤港澳紧密合作区框架下粤港澳之间的主要争议表现在合作目标、产业规划以及合作机制构建等方面欠统一。鉴于CEPA突出的政治性特点,又是国内区际协议,争议不宜采用法律强制方法,可适用CEPA第19条协商解决。但是,关于协商解决的实体性与程序性规定有待完善,应建构"以协商解决方法为主、以法律非强制性规范为辅"的协商解决机制。
The disputes risen from closer cooperation between Guangdong,Hong Kong Macao are the goals of cooperation,industrial planning,and cooperation mechanism to build and so on.For the reason that CEPA is an inter-district agreement,as well as it's political nature,the legal enforcement method is not appropriate.It is applicable for negotiated settlement that regulated by article 19 of CEPA;However,the substantive and procedural rules on the negotiation needs to be perfect.The improvement should be "The main solution is negotiation,and supplemented by legal methods of non-mandatory norms."
出处
《开放导报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期57-60,共4页
China Opening Journal
基金
2008年度广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<深化粤港澳合作中的法律理论与实务问题研究>(项目编号:08JDXM82002)研究成果
关键词
粤港澳紧密合作区
协商
CEPA
解决机制
closer cooperation between Guangdong Hong Kong &Macao consultation CEPA settlement mechanism