摘要
目的探索提高药物和微波对宫颈糜烂治愈率的方法。方法将在民心工程下乡过程中查出宫颈糜烂患者,选择常规做宫颈液基细胞学检查排除宫颈癌及癌前病变属于炎症且愿意治疗和随访的320例患者(轻度116例,中度125例,重度79例),随机分为用药组和对照组,用药组用宫颈炎康栓加微波及抗宫炎片治疗,对照组单纯用微波治疗,观察和比较其疗效和不良反应。结果宫颈炎康栓加微波和抗宫炎片对中度一次性治愈率96.92%,高于单用微波83.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);用药组对重度宫颈糜烂一次性治愈率90.48%,高于单用微波54.05%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后阴道排液,用药物组大于7 d的占20%,低于对照组的48.4%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对于不同程度宫颈糜烂选用宫颈炎康栓加微波加抗宫炎片治疗,可以更快更好治愈,并减少术后不良反应。
Objective To explore the methods to enhance the cure rate of the cervical erosion by medicine and microwave treatments.Methods? The methods were as follows.Among those who were examined in closer tie with people projects in villages,we selected 320 patients(116 were mild,125 were moderate,79 were severe) who were excluded with cervical cancer and pre-cancer but?inflammation with normal TCT.The 320 patients were randomly divided two groups,one was group taking medicine another as control groups.Groups taking medicine were treated with cervical?suppository?and microwave and kanggongyan tablets.Control groups were treated with microware solely.We examined and compared the treatment effects and adverse reaction.?Results? The results were one-time cure rate under?cervical?suppository?and microwave andkanggongyan tablets?treatments on the moderate patients was 96.92?%,which was higher than 83.33?% among those who were treated by microware solely.The difference had its own statistics significance(P0.05).One-time cure rate of severe cervical erosion among those who taking medicine was 90.48?%,higher than 54.05?% with microwave treatment solely.The difference had its own statistics significance(P0.05).Conclusion The results indicated that the?cervical?suppository and?microwave and?kanggongyan tablets?treatments on different degree of cervical erosion can cure faster and better and reduce the adverse reactions after surgeon.
出处
《医学研究与教育》
CAS
2011年第3期40-42,共3页
Medical Research and Education
关键词
宫颈糜烂
微波
药物
cervical erosion
microwave
medicine