期刊文献+

论强制缔约制度 被引量:1

Forced Contracting System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 强制缔约是对合同自由的限制,其目的是实现社会公正。它不同于格式合同、命令合同。强制缔约依据不同的标准可分为不同的形式。它的产生既对合同法律制度形成一定的冲击,又是司法社会化的表现,体现了对消费者保护的思想。我国现行法对强制缔约义务的规定具有很大的局限性,不能满足社会主义市场经济的发展。违反强制缔约义务的责任不应纳入侵权责任,而应形成一种新的责任类型,因为它的构成要件和承担方式具有自身特点。因此,我国民事立法不仅要确立各种具体的强制缔约形态,而且要建立强制缔约的相关规则。 Force is the restrictions on freedom of contract of the parties with the aim to achieve social justice.It differs from the standard contract,and order contracts.Forced contract based on different standards can be divided into different forms.It produces impact on contract formation of the legal system and it is the performance of the judicial socialization reflecting the idea of consumer protection.China's current law has a limitation on the mandatory provisions of the obligations of the parties and does not meet the development of the Socialist market economy.Violations of jus cogens obligation of responsibility should not be included in the tort liability of the parties,but should form a new type of responsibility,since its Constitution and commitment has its own characteristics.Therefore,the civil legislation in our country not only forces the Contracting Parties in establishing specific forms,but also establish related rules.
作者 刘建军
出处 《西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第4期101-105,共5页 Journal of Xidian University:Social Science Edition
关键词 强制缔约 强制缔约义务 法律责任 制度完善 Forced contracting Mandatory obligations of the parties Liability system perfection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1尹田.契约自由与社会公正的冲突与平衡[M].民商法论丛(第二卷),北京:法律出版社,1994:273.
  • 2王泽鉴.债法原理[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.344.
  • 3[英]阿蒂亚.程正康等译.合同法概论[M].北京:法律出版社,1982 24.
  • 4王泽鉴.民法债权总论(第一册)[M].台湾:三民书局,1996:73.
  • 5崔建远.合同法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.122.
  • 6崔建远.合同法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998..
  • 7孙森焱.民法债编总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
  • 8杨崇森.私法自制制度之流弊及其修正[M]//郑玉波.民法总则论文选辑.台湾:五南图书出版公司,1984:101.

共引文献180

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部