期刊文献+

我国制造业上市公司成本粘性问题研究

Study on Cost Stickiness of China's Manufacturing Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代研究发现,业务量等额增减变化时成本减少的幅度小于成本增加的幅度,这与传统的成本模型中假设成本随业务量的增减同幅度地增减变动有着明显的差异。本文对我国沪深两市2001年12月31日前上市的511家A股制造业上市公司的2001-2006年的年度数据进行测试,得出以下结论:我国制造业上市公司确实存在着成本粘性,主营业务收入增加1%,主营业务成本增加1.019 4%;主营业务收入减少1%,主营业务成本减少0.981 2%;与以往研究不同,随着时间跨度的增大,我国制造业上市公司的成本粘性水平没有降低,反而增强。 Contemporary studies on cost behaviour find that costs increase more with activity increases than they decrease in response to equivalent activity decreases.This sticky cost behaviour contradicts the traditional model which assumes that costs behave symmetrically for activity increases and decreases.With the analysis of accounting data during 2001 to 2005 from 511 Chinese manufacturing listed companies whose IPOs were before the end of 2001 on Shanghai and Shenzhen,we find operating costs are sticky in response to changes in revenues;operating costs increase,on average,by around 1.0194% per 1% increase in revenues,but decrease by only 0.981 2% per 1% decrease in revenues.Operating costs do not tend to be less sticky over longer time-horizons,and it intensifies significantly as time goes by.
作者 杨琳琳
机构地区 东北财经大学
出处 《山西财政税务专科学校学报》 2011年第3期37-41,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Finance & Taxation College
关键词 成本性态 成本粘性 制造业上市公司 cost behaviour cost stickiness manufacturing listed companies
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献52

  • 1孙健,陈良华.最终控制人与公司绩效关系的实证研究[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,7(S1):94-96. 被引量:2
  • 2孙铮,刘浩.中国上市公司费用“粘性”行为研究[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):26-34. 被引量:481
  • 3边喜春.费用“粘性”的成因及控制对策[J].价格月刊,2005(12):82-83. 被引量:40
  • 4刘武.企业费用“粘性”行为:基于行业差异的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(12):105-112. 被引量:180
  • 5Noreen E. and Soderstrom N. The accuracy of proportional cost models: evidence from hospital service departments[J] .. Review of Accounting. Studies, 1997, 2:89-114.
  • 6Subramaniam, C. and Weidenmier M.. Additional evidence on the sticky behaviour of costs[R] .. Working Paper, Texas Christian University, 2003.
  • 7Anderson M. and Banker R. Are selling, general, and distribution costs sticky?[J] .Journal of Accounting Research, 2003, 41 (1): 47- 63.
  • 8Balakrishnan R. and Peterson M. Does capacity utilization affect the stickiness of costs? [J]. Journal of Account, Audit, Finance, 2004, 19 (3):283-299.
  • 9Calleja K., Steliaros M. and Thomas D. C. A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2006, 17:127-140.
  • 10Cooper R. and Kaplan R. The Design of Cost Management Systems-Text and Cases, 2nd ed[M] . New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1998.

共引文献579

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部