期刊文献+

CCU护理干预分级量表的编制及信效度检测 被引量:8

Reliability and validity of rating scale for nursing intervention in CCU
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的制定及研究CCU护理干预分级量表的信效度。方法成立量表编制专家小组,制定量表条目、结构及评分方法,并用其对CCU住院的406例患者进行临床试验性应用,评价量表的内部一致性信度、重测信度、内容效度和结果效度。结果该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.909,分半信度为0.838,重测信度为0.704,信度较高,各条目分值与总分值Pearson相关系数为0.210—0.818,内容效度较好,主成分因子分析,提取3个公因子,解释61.77%的总方差变异,结构效度较好,与量表设计初衷基本符合。结论CCU护理干预分级量表具有较好的信度和效度,适用于辅助CCU护理干预分级。 Objective To build the reliability and validity of rating scale for nursing intervention in CCU. Methods An expert panel on scale was formed. The reliability and validity of rating scale for nursing intervention were evaluated based on data of 406 subjects in CCU. Results The Cronbach' s α coefficiency was 0. 909, the split-half reliability was 0.838, test-retest reliability was 0.704. The correlation coefficient between individual item and the total score ranged from 0. 210 to 0. 818, the content validity is good; principal component factor analysis, extracted three common factors to explain the variation of the total variance of 61.77% ; Good construct validity, and scale designed to meet the basic. Conclusions The reliability and validity of rating scale for nursing intervention is good.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2011年第20期2376-2379,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 武汉市中心医院资助项目(200902)
关键词 CCU 护理干预 分级量表 信度 效度 CCU Nursing intervention Rating scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献52

共引文献140

同被引文献73

引证文献8

二级引证文献240

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部