期刊文献+

CRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR AND MORPHOLOGY OF ONE-STEP REACTION COMPATIBILIZED MICROFIBRILLAR REINFORCED ISOTACTIC POLYPROPYLENE/POLY(ETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE)(iPP/PET) BLENDS 被引量:3

CRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR AND MORPHOLOGY OF ONE-STEP REACTION COMPATIBILIZED MICROFIBRILLAR REINFORCED ISOTACTIC POLYPROPYLENE/POLY(ETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE)(iPP/PET) BLENDS
原文传递
导出
摘要 One-step reaction compatibilized microfibrillar reinforced iPP/PET blends (CMRB) were successfully prepared through a "slit extrusion-hot stretching-quenching" process. Crystallization behavior and morphology of CMRB were systematically investigated. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) observations showed blurry interface of compatibilized common blend (CCB). The crystallization behavior of neat iPP, CCB, microfibrillar reinforced iPP/PET blend (MRB) and CMRB was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). The increase of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate during nonisothermal crystallization process indicated both PET particles and mierofibrils could serve as nucleating agents and PET microfibrils exhibited higher heterogeneous nucleation ability, which were also vividly revealed by results of POM. Compared with MRB sample, CMRB sample has lower crystallization temperature due to existence of PET microfibrils with smaller aspect ratio and wider distribution. In addition, since in situ compatibilizer tends to stay in the interphase, it could also hinder the diffusion ofiPP molecules to the surface of PET phase, leading to decrease of crystallization rate. Two-dimensional wide-angle X-ray diffi:action (2D-WAXD) was preformed to characterize the crystalline structure of the samples by injection molding, and it was found that well-developed PET microfibrils contained in MRB sample promoted formation of t-phase of/PP. One-step reaction compatibilized microfibrillar reinforced iPP/PET blends (CMRB) were successfully prepared through a "slit extrusion-hot stretching-quenching" process. Crystallization behavior and morphology of CMRB were systematically investigated. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) observations showed blurry interface of compatibilized common blend (CCB). The crystallization behavior of neat iPP, CCB, microfibrillar reinforced iPP/PET blend (MRB) and CMRB was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). The increase of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate during nonisothermal crystallization process indicated both PET particles and mierofibrils could serve as nucleating agents and PET microfibrils exhibited higher heterogeneous nucleation ability, which were also vividly revealed by results of POM. Compared with MRB sample, CMRB sample has lower crystallization temperature due to existence of PET microfibrils with smaller aspect ratio and wider distribution. In addition, since in situ compatibilizer tends to stay in the interphase, it could also hinder the diffusion ofiPP molecules to the surface of PET phase, leading to decrease of crystallization rate. Two-dimensional wide-angle X-ray diffi:action (2D-WAXD) was preformed to characterize the crystalline structure of the samples by injection molding, and it was found that well-developed PET microfibrils contained in MRB sample promoted formation of t-phase of/PP.
作者 李忠明
出处 《Chinese Journal of Polymer Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第5期540-551,共12页 高分子科学(英文版)
基金 financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.20776087) National Programs for High Technology Research and Development of China(No.2008AA03Z510)
关键词 Isotactic polypropylene Poly(ethylene terephthalate) In situ compatibilization Microfibrillar reinforced blends Crystallization behavior. Isotactic polypropylene Poly(ethylene terephthalate) In situ compatibilization Microfibrillar reinforced blends Crystallization behavior.
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Loos, J., Schimanski, T., Hofman, J., Peijs, T. and Lemstra, P.J., Polymer, 2001, 42:3827.
  • 2Ward, I.M. and Sweeney, J., "An introduction of the mechanical properties of solid polymers", John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2004.
  • 3Leclair, A. and Favis, B.D., Polymer, 1996, 37:4723.
  • 4Wu, S.H., Polym. Eng. Sci., 1990, 30:753.
  • 5Saujanya, C. and Radhakrishnan, S., Polymer, 2001, 42:4537.
  • 6Fakirov, S., Evstatiev, M. and Petrovich, S., Macromolecules, 1993, 26:5219.
  • 7Boyaud, M.F., Ait-Kadi, A., Bousmina, M., Michel, A. and Cassagnau, P., Polymer, 2001, 42:6515.
  • 8Migler, K.B., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, 86:1023.
  • 9Li, Z.M., Yang, M.B., Huang, R., Lu, A. and Feng, J.M., J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2002, 18:419.
  • 10Li, Z.M., Yang, M.B., Lu, A., Feng, J.M., and Huang, R., Mater. Lea., 2002, 56:756.

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部