3Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, et al. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid- based, thin-layer system for cervical screening[J]. Obstet Gyneeol, 1997,90(2): 278-284.
5Corffortini M, Bulgaresi P, Cariaggi MP, et al. Conventional pap smear and liquid--based cervical cytology smear:Comparison from the same patient[J]. Tumori, 2002, 88(4) : 288-290.
6Nieminen p, Hakama M, Viikki M, et al. Prospective and randoraised public-health trial on neural network-assisted screening for cervi- ca/cancer in Fin/and: Result of the first year[J]. Int J Caner, 2003, 103(3) :422-426.
7Rieck GC, Tristram A, Hauke A, et al. Cervical screening in 20 -24 year old[J]. J Med Screen,2006,13:64-71.
8Nygard JF, Nygard M, Skare GB, et al. Pap smear screening in women under 30 in the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program, with a comparison of immediate biopsy vs Pap smear triage of moderate dysplasia [ J ]. Acta Cytol,2006,50 : 295-302.
9Huitron S, Bonvicino A, Fadare O. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepitbelial lesion" : comparative longitudinal follow-up [ J ]. Ann Diagn Patho1,2008,12 : 187-190.
10Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Khobjai A, et al. Complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia: a prospective study [ J ]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2006,89 : 583-587.
