期刊文献+

创伤后应激障碍的老年患者心率变异性分析

An Analysis of Heart Rate Variability in Old Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨老年患者发生创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)时自主神经功能改变的特点.方法 采用心率变异性(HRV)分析指标,检测PTSD老年患者(A组,n=32)的HRV参数并与同年龄创伤后未发生PTSD者(B组,n=30)以及同年龄组健康人群(对照组,n=80)进行对比分析.结果 ①A组、B组与对照组相比,SDNN、SDANN、SDNN Index差异均有显著统计学意义(均P<0.01);②夜间HRV各项参数与白天比较,SDNN Index [(33.32±22.38)ms、(28.05±19.02)ms]差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),SDNN[(48.00±26.55)ms、(43.18±19.91)ms]、rMSSD[(29.18±14.79)ms、(28.00±14.56)ms]、PNN50[(7.81±2.37)ms、(7.57±2.78)ms]及SDANN[(30.18±18.10 )ms、(29.77±12.98)ms]差异均无统计学意义(均P >0.05).结论 PTSD可引起老年患者自主神经张力异常及调节功能失衡,这种损害以夜间明显.在治疗原发病的同时,应重视PTSD的发生及其对老年人自主神经功能的影响. Objective To analyze changes of autonomic function in old patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Methods The heart rate variability was analyzed and compared in old patients with (group A, n=32) and without (group B, n=30) posttraumatic stress disorder after trauma and healthy old people (control group, n=80). Results The parameters of heart rate variability were significantly lower in group A than in control group (P 〈 0.01). The standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) index was significantly higher during nighttime than during daytime (33.32±22.38 vs.28.05±19.02) (P 〈0.05), while SDNN (48.00±26.55 vs.43.18±19.91), the root-mean-square of differences of adjacent RR intervals (29.18±14.79 vs.28.00±14.56), the percent of differences between adjacent NN intervals 〉 50 ms (7.81±2.37 vs.7.57±2.78) and the standard deviation of 5-minute means of NN intervals (30.18±18.10 vs.29.77±12.98) were not significantly different between night and day (all P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Post-traumatic stress disorder may result in an abnormal auto- nomic tone and autonomic imbalance in old patients, which is more obvious at night.
作者 王素平
出处 《心电学杂志》 2011年第4期314-316,共3页 Journal of Electrocardiology(China)
关键词 老年人 创伤后应激障碍 心率变异性 Old people Posttraumatic stress disorder Heart rate variability
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1何鸣,吴仁刚,章晓冬,季舜玉,储鸣,杨德森.翻车事故幸存者中精神创伤后应激障碍[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(4):148-151. 被引量:39
  • 2中华医学会精神科学会编.中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准 第3版[M].山东科学技术出版社,2001,4.96—97.
  • 3Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication [ J ]. Arch Gen Psychiat, 2005,62 ( 6 ) : 593 - 602.
  • 4Kuehn BM. Scientists probe PTSD effects, treatments[ J]. JAMA, 2008,299( 1 ) :23 -26.
  • 5Schmidt NB, Zvolensky MJ. Risk factor research and prevention for anxiety disorders: Introduction to the special series on risk and prevention of anxiety pathology [ J ]. Behav Modif, 2007,31 ( 1 ) :3 - 7.
  • 6Bonanno GA, Mancini AD. The human capacity to thrive in the face of potential trauma[J]. Pediatrics, 2008,121 (2) :369 - 375.
  • 7Van Emmerik AAP, Kamphuis JH, Hulsbosch AM, et al. Single session debriefing after psychological trauma : A meta-analysis [ J ]. Lancet, 2002,360:766 - 771.
  • 8Zatzick D, Roy-Byrne P, Russo J, et al. A randomized effectiveness trial of stepped collaborative care for acutely injured trauma survivors [ J]. Arch Gen Psychiatr, 2004,5:500- 506.
  • 9Zatzick DF, Roy-Byrne P, Russo JE, et al. Collaborative interventions for physically injured trauma survivors: A pilot randomized effectiveness trial[ J]. Gen Hosp Psychiat, 2001,23:114 - 123.
  • 10Rose S, Brewin CR, Andrews B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of individual psychological debriefing for victims of violent crime [J]. Psychol Med, 1999,29(4):793 -799.

共引文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部