期刊文献+

无金标准诊断试验灵敏度和特异度的贝叶斯估计方法 被引量:5

Bayes estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨在无金标准情况下诊断试验灵敏度和特异度的贝叶斯估计方法,并通过模拟实验验证此方法的有效性和适用性.方法 应用贝叶斯原理,结合一个或者两个对照诊断试验,采用对照诊断试验与待测诊断试验诊断结果相互独立或者存在相关模型;和两个对照诊断试验诊断结果存在相关,并且同时与待测诊断试验结果相互独立模型;以及一个对照诊断试验与待测诊断试验诊断结果存在相关,并且同时与另一个对照诊断试验诊断结果相互独立模型,对一种新的诊断方法的灵敏度、特异度进行估计.结果 模拟试验表明在先验信息相对准确的条件下,所给出的几种不同模型均能较准确的估计待测诊断方法的灵敏度和特异度,估测参数范围包括设定真值,并且估测参数均值基本与真实情况相同;此外,模拟实验结果表明,利用两个对照诊断试验模型估计参数的估计效果优于使用一个对照诊断试验模型时的参数估计效果.结论 本文介绍的贝叶斯方法能够有效地应用于无金标准诊断试验的评价,从而解决了无金标准诊断试验无法评价的难题. Objective To provide a method to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test in the absence of a gold standard, and to study its properties through simulation experiments. Methods We considered estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test in the following settings. There were two conditionally independent tests, one of which was a control group, two correlated tests, one of which was a control group, and three tests where two tests were correlated but jointly independent of the third test. For each scenario, we described a Bayesian model that incorporates parameters of interest. Results The simulation experiments verify that, given the beta prior distributions of every parameter, the models can evaluate them accurately. In addition, compared to the model with one control group, the estimating results of the model with two control groups is more close to the true values. Conclusion The Bayesian approach can be used to evaluate a new diagnostic test effectively in the absence of a gold standard.
出处 《中国医院统计》 2011年第2期111-115,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30872185)
关键词 诊断试验 无金标准 灵敏度 特异度 Diagnostic tests Absence of a gold standard Sensitivity Specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Lawrence Joseph, Theresa Gyorkes, Louis Coupal. Bayesian Estimation of Disease Prevalence and the Parameters of Diagnostic Tests in the Absence of a Gold Standard[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology,1995,141 (3) : 263 -272.
  • 2A.J. Branscunm,I. A. Gardnerb, Johnson. Bayesian modeling of animal- and herd-level prevalences[ J ]. Preventive Veterinary Medicine,2004,66 (1-4) :101-112.
  • 3A.J. Branscum, I. A. Gardnerb, Johnson. Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling[ J]. Preventive Vet- erinary Medicine, 2005,68 (2-4) : 145-163.
  • 4Dendukuri, Joseph. Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional de- pendence between multiple diagnostic tests[J]. Biometrics,2001,57( 1 ): 158-167.
  • 5Georgiadis, M.P. , Johnson, W.O. , Gardner,et al. Correlation-adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests[J]. Appl. Star., 2003,52( 1 ) :63-76.
  • 6Smith AFM, Roberts GO. Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods [ J ]. J Roy Statist Soc B, 1993,55(1) :3-23.
  • 7郑水龙,陈炳为,刘沛,闵捷.无金标准情况下三个诊断试验评价方法[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(2):129-131. 被引量:5
  • 8Ian A. Gardner, Henrik Stryhn. Conditional dependence between tests af- fects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases [ J ]. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2000,45 ( 1-2 ) : 107-122.
  • 9顾海雁,陈启光.无金标准情况下诊断试验的评价方法[J].中国卫生统计,1999,16(4):203-205. 被引量:12

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘军英,李学军,迟丽平,马彩莲,王丽红.3种幽门螺杆菌常用诊断方法的评价[J].山西医药杂志,2005,34(2):156-156. 被引量:5
  • 2张尧庭,贝叶斯统计推断,1991年,27-31,36-40页
  • 3李文鹏,主编.医学伦理学.山东大学出版社,2002.
  • 4Myles JP,Nixon RM,Duffy SW,et al.Bayesian evaluation of breast cancer screening using data from two studies.Stat Med,2003,22:1661-1674.
  • 5Lajoie AS,McCabe SJ,Thomas B,et al.Determining the sensitivity and specificity of common diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis.Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery,2005,116:502—506.
  • 6Joseph L.Gyorkos TW,Coupal L.Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of agold standard.American journal of epidemiology,1995,141:263—272.
  • 7Carlin BP,Louis TA.Bayes,empirical Bayes methods for data analysis second edition.London:Chapman & Hall.2003,6-55.
  • 8顾海雁,陈启光.无金标准情况下诊断试验的评价方法[J].中国卫生统计,1999,16(4):203-205. 被引量:12
  • 9焦健华,徐顺福,袁建平,张红杰,张小勇,赵志泉.3种方法不同组合诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的比较[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),1999,19(5):406-408. 被引量:3
  • 10董卫,马传栋.肿瘤诊断试验论著质量的初步评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2001,23(1):28-30. 被引量:14

共引文献13

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部