去伪存真见铁证 毋庸置疑隐白梅——对叶植先生《习凿齿暮年遁隐新余白梅说质疑》探究

Research into Mr Ye Zhi's Academic Thesis "Query on the Story of Xi Zaochi's Hermit in Baimei,Xinyu in His declining Years"

习凿齿(328—412)暮年遁隐白梅,卒葬枣木山,有其遗迹及袁州的《郡志》《大元一统志》《大明一统志》和江西的许多地方史志记载为证。叶文对此全面否定。然历代诸多有关墓葬、碑文、家谱编修、人名字号的史料及论述以至习凿齿本人著述都证实,叶文所引为据者均失于考证,或违背历史真实,或有悖常理,或"无的放矢",或以遭诬损的后人著作否定千百年前的史志等记载,全文逻辑混乱,漏洞百出,不能自圆其说。

Many righteous officials or scholar well affirmed that Xi Zaochi lived as recluse in Baimei,Xinyu of Jiangxi,and his body was interred here in his old age on the base of their exploration on historical data,historical relic and inspection on the spot.Which Mr Ye Zhi went to negative his predecessors＇ conclusions has looked like to make unfounded accusations,because his proof lacks emollient evidence,consequently we think that Xi Zaochi retired into Baimei,Xinyu of Jiangxi and interred here in his old age is an irrefutable fact.