论张学良对“不抵抗”政策的“不辩”之辩

On Peter H.L.Chang's Debates on "No Argument" of "Non-resistance" Policy

九一八事变,让张学良背上"不抵抗"的骂名,张学良对此曾表示:不辩不争,毁誉由人。而在张学良的口述中,他谈的最多的是九一八事变中有关"不抵抗"问题,他既反省自我,也为己辩护;他辩驳细节问题,对还原历史至关重要;他承认"判断错误",却否认"不抵抗"。这种"不辩"之辩,不仅颠覆诸多历史观点,化解重要历史疑点,也让人们看清了张学良作为当事人的心路历程。

Owing to Mukden Incident,Peter H.L.Chang was to blame for his ＂Non-resistance＂ policy.In response,Peter H.L.Chang once claimed that he would neither argue nor contend about it,and whether he should be praised or condemned for it was open to debate.In his oral accounts,however,the problem Peter H.L.Chang expounded most was the ＂Non-resistance＂ policy in Mukden Incident.He not only introspected,but also defended for himself.He disputed about the details,which he believed were vital to reconstruct the distant past;he admitted his misjudgment,but denied his ＂Non-resistance＂ policy.The so-called ＂No Argument＂ debates actually have overturned many historical perspectives,eliminated important historical doubts and helped people see clearly Peter H.L.Chang＇s adventures of mind as a person involved in the incident.