期刊文献+

元记忆监测错误的修正 被引量:2

The Correction of Metamemory Monitoring Errors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 准确的元记忆监测是人们能够进行高效率学习的前提。本文介绍了两种元记忆监测的错误修正。其中,反馈能够很好地修正信心判断的错误。而学习判断的预见偏差也可以有两种修正方法,即基于经验的修正和基于理论的修正。另外,文中还讨论了当元记忆监测判断被纠正后,主观经验并没有被纠正,仍会影响人们的认知。最后,通过对研究结论的讨论,得出了教育上的一些启示。 The accuracy of the metamemeory monitoring is the prerequisite for the high-efficiency learning. The correction of two errors of the metamemeory monitoring was introduced. Feedback serves to correct the errors of judgment of confidence. And, there are mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures for mending the illusions of competence in judgment of learning. Then, the perseverance of subjective experience in the face of the correction of metamemory judgment was discussed. Implications and suggestions for the educational domain ware advanced.
作者 贾宁 代景华
出处 《心理研究》 2011年第4期49-56,共8页 Psychological Research
基金 河北省教育厅人文社科项目"学习过程中的自我监控"(S2010604)的资助
关键词 元记忆监测 错误 修正 信心判断 学习判断 metamemory monitoring error correction judgment of confidence judgment of learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Nelson T O, Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In Bower G H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1990, 125-173.
  • 2韩凯.元记忆研究的理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1994,4(1):29-33. 被引量:13
  • 3Kulhavy R W, Stock W A. Feedback in written in- struction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1989, 1:279-308.
  • 4Stoek W A. Kulhavy R W. Pridemore D R. Krug D. Responding to feedback after multi-choice answers: The influeenee of response confidence. Quarterly Jour- nal of Experimental Psyehology, 1992, 45:619-667.
  • 5Lovelace F A. Metamemory: Monitoring future recalla- bility during study. Journal of Experimental Psyeholo- gy: Learning, Memory, and Cogni ton, 1984, 10: 756-766.
  • 6Glenbcrg A M, Sanocki T, Epstein W, Morris C. En- hancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Ex- perimenatal Psyehology: General, 1987, 21:699-710.
  • 7Sehwartz B I, Metealfe J. Methodogieal problems andpitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In Met- calfe J, Shimamura A.(Eds.)Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambredge. MA: MIT press, 1994, 93-113.
  • 8Thompson W B. Metamemory accuracy: Effects of feedback and the stability of individual differences. The American Journal of Psychology, 1998, 111 (1) : 33-42.
  • 9Kelley C M, Lindsay S D. Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 1993, 34:1-24.
  • 10Butterfield B, Metcaffe J. Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001, 27(6) : 1491-1494.

二级参考文献43

  • 1沈大为,韩凯.FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):320-327. 被引量:9
  • 2[1]Dunlosky J, Nelson T O. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOLs) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 1992, 20: 373~380
  • 3[2]Shaw R J, Craik F I M. Age differences in performance on a cue recall task. Psychology and Aging, 1989, 4 (2): 131~135
  • 4[3]Carroll M, Nelson T O, Kirwan A. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 1997, 95: 239~253
  • 5[4]Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgment of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, 126: 349~370
  • 6[5]Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 1993, 100: 609~639
  • 7[6]Koriat A. Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, 124: 311~333
  • 8[7]Kelemen W L. Metamemory for related information is determined by the type of mnemonic cue. The Sciences and Engineering, 1999, 59 (7-B): 3726
  • 9[8]Schreiber T A. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cues recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26: 553~571
  • 10[9]Schreiber T A, Nelson D L. The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighboring concepts linked to the test cue. Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26: 869~883

共引文献69

同被引文献21

  • 1张奇,刘万伦.类别学习多重系统理论的研究与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):78-87. 被引量:5
  • 2李乃民;张大鹏;王宽全.舌诊学[M]{H}北京:学苑出版社,200649-83.
  • 3宋天斌.实用中医舌诊彩色图谱[M]{H}合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,199446-78.
  • 4孙睦.现代中医诊断和西医诊断的比较与思考[J]中华现代中医学杂志,2007(03):214-215.
  • 5Ark,T.K,Brooks,L.R,Eva,K.W. Giving learners the best of both worlds:do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern reognition to novices[J].{H}ACADEMIC MEDICINE,2006,(04):405-409.
  • 6Ashby,F.G,Alfonso-Reese,L.A,Turken,A.U. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning[J].{H}Psychological Review,1998,(03):442-481.
  • 7Brooks,L.R,Norman,G.R,Allen,S.W. Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task[J].{H}Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1991,(03):278-287.
  • 8Coderre,S,Mandin,H,Harasym,P.H. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success[J].{H}Medical Education,2003,(08):695-703.
  • 9Evans,J.S. Dual processing accounts of reasoning,judgment and social cognition[J].Annual Reviews of Psychology,2008,(01):255-278.
  • 10Friedman,C.P,Elstein A.E,Wolf F.M. Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation.A multisite study of 2 systems[J].The journal of the American Medical Association,1999,(19):1851-1856.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部