《福柯的生死爱欲》修辞学批评:再叙事与再阐释

Rhetoric's Criticism of The Passion of Michael Foucault: Renarrating and Reinterpreting

以《福柯的生死爱欲》为修辞学批评对象,分析人物传记叙事具有的再叙事与再阐释特质。再叙事解构传主自我表白叙事、传主著作叙事;评价人文献叙事;建构作者叙事。三重再叙事结构,是本文的再阐释。再阐释体现为叙事的修辞化,先解构作者叙事,后重新建构"纸上的福柯"修辞幻象。再叙事和再阐释共同寻找表达背后的动因,发掘文本生成机制。这里可以发现叙事学和广义修辞学的联系与区别。

Rhetoric＇s critical analysis of The Passion of Michael Foucault proves that biographical narration is provided with such characteristics as renarrating and reinterpreting.Renarrating covers the following three parts： deconstruction of biographee＇s self vindicatory narrating and biographee＇s writings narrating;comments＇ documentary narrating,construction of author＇s narrating. The above three parts of renarrating are the body part of reinterpreting.Reinterpreting is the narrating rhetoric,which means firstly deconstruct the author＇s narrating and then reconstruct the rhetoric illusion of Foucault on paper.Both renarrating and reinterpreting are looking into the motives behind the ways of expressions and the writing mechanism of the text,in which the differences between Narratorogy and Retoric can be found.