期刊文献+

以道论诗与以诗言道:宋代理学家诗学观原论——兼论“洛学兴而文字坏” 被引量:7

On the Poetics of Song Neo-Confucians:Discussing Poetry in Terms of Dao and Expounding Dao in Poetic Language Reflecting Also on "The Rise of Luoxue School Leading to the Corruption of Poetics"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宋代理学家以道论诗,曾用"自成文"、"人心感物"或"天机自动,天籁自鸣"等说法,建构起一套诗学观,包括诗歌生成论、诗歌价值观及诗无工拙论等,认为最好的诗是圣贤摅发胸中所蕴,自然而然,非人力所可为。他们又以诗言道,诗就是道,不能载道的诗应当删去。总之,理学家所论并非文学意义上的诗。这些论调对传统诗学带来了极大的冲击,并导致宋诗的急遽衰落。 The Neo-Confucians of Song Dynasty discussed poetry in the perspective of Dao,establishing a poetics based on such views as poetry "being naturally formed " out of the minds of sages,and running from "human heart moved by objects",believing poetry is "nature expressing and revealing itself".They had their own ideas of poetical composition,considering the best poetry the result of the sages' natural expression of their emotions,unattainable by any human effort.Furthermore,they chose to expound Dao with poetry,the ultimate purpose of which,they argued,was to express Dao.To sum up,although the Neo-Confucians were not talking about poetry in the literary sense,their comments had a bad influence on poetical criticism,eventually leading to the rapid decline of poetry in the Song Dynasty.
作者 祝尚书
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期63-73,共11页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 理学家 诗学 程颐 朱熹 Neo-Confucians poetics Dao Cheng Yi Zhu Xi
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1叶适.答刘子至书[M]//水心先生文集:卷二七.北京:中华书局,1983:554.
  • 2程颐.河南程氏遗书[M]//二程集.北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 3程颐.答朱长文书(或云程颢作)[M]∥二程集.北京:中华书局,1981:600.
  • 4朱熹.诗集传序[M]//朱文公文集:卷七六.四部丛刊初编本.
  • 5卫浞.礼记集说:卷九二[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.
  • 6包恢.敝帚稿略[M].影印文渊阎四库全书本.
  • 7严羽.沧浪花诗话·诗辨[M]∥郭绍虞.沧浪诗话校释.北京:人民文学出版社,1983:26.
  • 8胡应麟.诗薮·内编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
  • 9真德秀.西山先生文集:卷三四[M].四部丛刊初编本.
  • 10张载.正蒙[M]//张载集.章锡琛点校.北京:中华书局,1978.

共引文献372

同被引文献90

引证文献7

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部