期刊文献+

广东沿海地区风暴潮易损性评估 被引量:19

A Storm Surge Vulnerability Assessment for Coastal Guangdong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从系统学角度出发,对广东省沿海地区(阳江―汕尾岸段)风暴潮灾害易损性因子进行综合分析,提出从社会经济、土地利用、生态环境、滨海构造物和承灾能力5个方面对风暴潮承灾体进行易损性评估,建立广东省沿海地区风暴潮易损性评价指标体系。依托国际通用的海岸易损性评估模式并对其进行改进,建立与广东省沿海地区相适应的风暴潮易损性评价模型,运用ArcGIS绘制广东沿海地区(阳江―汕尾岸段)风暴潮易损程度分区图。评估结果表明:珠海市、广州番禺区和台山市风暴潮易损程度最高,中山市、东莞市、惠阳市区和海丰县次之,江门市、汕尾市区、阳江市区和阳东县易损程度中等,深圳宝安区、开平市和恩平市易损程度较低,广州市区、佛山顺德区、深圳市区和深圳龙岗区易损程度最低。 A comprehensive analysis is conducted in this paper on the vulnerability factors to storm surge in the coastal area of Guangdong(the section from Yangjing to Shanwei) from the view of systematics.Five vulnerability assessment indicators of disaster-bearing bodies are put forward which are social economic index,land use index,eco-environmental index,coastal construction index and bearing-disaster capability index.A storm surge vulnerability assessment index system for coastal Guangdong is established.The internationally general coastal vulnerability assessment mode is improved to construct a vulnerability evolution model for the coastal area of Guangdong.By using ArcGIS,a vulnerability zoning map of storm surges in the studied region is drawn.Evaluation results show that the vulnerability degree to storm surge in Zhuhai,Panyu and Taishan is the highest,that in Zhongshan,Dongguan,Huiyang and Haifeng the second,that in Jiangmen,Shanwei,Yangjiang and Yangdong the middle,that in Bao'an,Kaiping and Enping the lower,and that in Guangzhou,Shunde,Shenzhen and Longgang the lowest.This study reveals the risk of storm surges in the coastal cities and that would be helpful in future to guide the land use of coastal cities and the prevention and mitigation of storm surge disasters.
作者 李阔 李国胜
出处 《热带地理》 北大核心 2011年第2期153-158,177,共7页 Tropical Geography
基金 国家科技支撑项目"综合全球环境变化与全球化风险防范关键技术研究与示范"(2006BAD20B05)
关键词 风暴潮 易损性评估 广东沿海地区 评价模型 指标体系 storm surge vulnerability assessment coastal area of Guangdong evolution model index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1冯士榨.风暴潮导论[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,4-9.
  • 2河海大学交通学院.海洋学院海岸灾害及预报[M].南京:河海大学出版社,2003:45-48.
  • 3沙文钮,杨支中.风暴潮、浪数值预报[M].北京:海洋出版社,2004:28-34.
  • 4Kay R C, Eliot I, Caton B, et al. A review of the intergovernmental panel on climate change's common methodology for assessing the vulnerability of coastal areas to sea-level rise[J]. Coastal Management, 1996, 24 (2): 165-188.
  • 5United Nation. Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters: Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015[J]. Hyogo: World Conference on Disaster Reduction, 2005, 36 ( 3 ): 45-58.
  • 6United Nation/ISDR. Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives 2004 version[M]. New York: United Nations Publication, 2004: 24-37.
  • 7IPCC CZMS. Global climate change and the rising challenge of the sea. Report of the Coastal Zone Management Subgroup[R]. Hague: IPCC Response Strategies Working Group, 1992: 57-69.
  • 8Parry M L, Carter T R. Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment: A Guide to the IPCC Approach[R]. London: Earth Scan Publications, 1998: 166-185.
  • 9Burton I, Feenstra J F, Parry M L, et al. UNEP handbook on methods for climate change impact assessment and adaptation studies, Version 2.1[R]. Amsterdam: United Nations Environment Program and Institute for Environmental Studies, 1998 : 63-85.
  • 10Lisa R Kleinosky, Brent Yamal, Ann Fisher, et al. Vulnerability of Hampton Roads, Virginia to Storm-Surge Flooding and Sea-level Rise[J]. Natural Hazards, 2007, 40 ( 1 ): 43-70.

二级参考文献124

共引文献359

同被引文献471

引证文献19

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部