期刊文献+

英汉次谓语的语义对比研究 被引量:2

A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF THE SEMANTICS IN ENGLISH AND CHINESE SECONDARY PREDICATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 次谓语有描述性次谓语和结果性次谓语之分。从语义取向方面来看,英语描述性次谓语可以是主语取向的也可以是宾语取向的,结果性次谓语只能是宾语取向的;汉语中,描述性次谓语和结果性次谓语既可以是宾语取向的也可以是主语取向的。语义选择决定语类选择,充当英汉次谓语的词语虽有特例但一般是动态谓词。多个次谓语在一个句中共存时存在语义限制,那就是一个句子只能被限定一次,但是英汉多个次谓语在句中出现的顺序不一样。英汉次谓语都具有使句子表达生动、简洁、流畅的语义强势。 Secondary predication is divided into depictives and resultatives.In English,depictives can be either subject-oriented or object-oriented,and resultatives can only be object-oriented while the Chinese depictives and resultatives both can be subject-oriented or object-oriented.English and Chinese secondary predicates are generally stage-level predicates with some exception according to their semantic meaning.Several secondary predicates can co-occur in a sentence,but the order depends on their semantic meaning.Both English and Chinese secondary predications can make the sentence simpler,more vivid and fluent in semantics.
作者 陈兴
出处 《云梦学刊》 2011年第4期138-140,共3页 Journal of Yunmeng
基金 湖南省教育厅科研项目"英汉次谓语对比研究"(项目编号为09C712)的阶段性成果
关键词 描述性次谓语 结果性次谓语 语义取向 共存限制 语类选择 depictives resultatives the semantic orientation co-occurrence categorical selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hallidy, M. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English[J]. Journal of Linguistics. 3, 1967. 37-81.
  • 2Winkler, S.. Focus and Secondary Predication [M]. Berlin-New York. Mouton de Gruyter. 1997.278-326.
  • 3Niina Zhang. The Asymmetry Between Depictives and Resultatives in Chinese[C]. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (Eds), "Asymmetry in Grammar" John Benjamins. 2001 . 165-168.
  • 4Kratzer, Augelika. Stage-level and Individual level Predicates. The Generic Book [C]. ed. By Gregory N. Carlsou and Francis Jeffrey Pellertier. Chicago. University of Chicago press. 1996. 125-75.
  • 5Rapoport, T. R. Adjunct-predicate Licensing and D-structure [C]. Syntax and semantics. Vol. 25. ed, By Susan Rothstein. New.
  • 6缪锦安.汉语的语义结构和补语形式[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.2000.
  • 7刘宓庆.汉英句子扩展机制对比研究[J].现代外语,1992,15(1):10-15. 被引量:32
  • 8Simpson, J. Resultatives. In L. Levin, M. Rappaport, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Papers in I..xical-Functional Grammar [C]. Bloomington. Indiana University Linguistics C1ub.1983.143-157.
  • 9Rothstein, Susan D. The Syntactic Forms of Predication [C].Ph. D. Dissertation, MIT. Published Indiana University Linguistcs Club, 1985.
  • 10陈兴.“描述”次谓语与“结果”次谓语的语义阐释[J].外语学刊,2010(1):62-66. 被引量:4

二级参考文献26

  • 1郭洁.从关联理论看对等原则的局限性[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,7(4):94-96. 被引量:1
  • 2Williams~ Edwin. Against Small clauses[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1983(14): 287- 308.
  • 3Rothstein, Susan D. The Syntactic Forms of Predication [C]. Ph.D.Dissertation, MIT., 1985.
  • 4Rothstein , Susan D . Predicates and Their Subjects [M]. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 2001.
  • 5Chomsky, Noam. Barriers[M]. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass, 1986a.
  • 6Guemann Steven. Secondary Predication in English and Spanish[C]. Ph.D.Diss, University of California at Berkley, 1974.
  • 7Winkler S.Focus and SecondaryPredication[M]. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997: 6.
  • 8Kratzer A.Stage-level and individual-level predicates[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago. 1989: 125-175.
  • 9Simpson, Jane H.Resultatives[C]//Lori Beth Levin, Malka Rappoport, Annie Zaenan. Papers in Lexical Functional Grammar. Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1983:.
  • 10Hallidy M.Notes on transitivity and theme in English [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1967(3): 37-81 .

共引文献35

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部