期刊文献+

“杀”的语义演变过程和动因 被引量:8

The Process and Motivations of Sha(杀)'s Semantic Evolution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 先秦两汉时期"杀"单独作谓语时表示"动作+结果","结果"蕴涵在动作行为之中;至宋元时期基本上只表示动作,不表示结果,并持续至今。"杀"发生了两次根本变化:1)中古汉语"X杀"、"杀Y"的出现,由于缺省状态下,"杀"表异质活动,光杆动词"杀"本身可以表达"杀死"的语义功能,所以在表示"动作"语义时有两条并行途径,即光杆"杀"和动结式的"杀Y";2)"V杀"被"V死"替代,在近代汉语中只剩下"杀Y"。由于概念结构和语义激活等因素的制约,使成式、偏正式及并列式之间能相互转化,而范域式则具有独特的句法表现。这两次变化和汉语语言类型从综合型向分析型转变,以及动补结构、体标记成熟的大背景密切相关。 Abstract The sha(杀) in archaic Chinese indicated "action+result" and entails result naturally, acting as the predicate in a clause. It changed and meant result almost exclusively during the Song Yuan dynasties and remains the same since then. There are two major shifts: 1) the emergence of X+ sha and shaq-Y in medieval Chinese. The sha has the default value "to make killed" because of its bet erogeneous nature, thus it has two paralleled ways of expressing action, i. e. , the bare sha and verb result clusters sha+X. 2) Vq-sha was replaced by V+si(死). The causative, modifer, and coordi nate structures are interchangeable for they are restricted by the same conceptual structures and se- mantic activation. However, the control structure has special syntactic function due to sha's wide do main. These two shifts were closely related to the typological trend in which Chinese moved from syn- thetic to analytic. The deveploment of verb-result clusters and aspectual markers also contributed greatly to the fact.
作者 帅志嵩
出处 《语言科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期365-374,共10页 Linguistic Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(08JC740005)资助
关键词 类型变化 语义演变 概念结构“杀” typological shift semantic evolution conceptual structure sha(杀)
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1I-Iaiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation, Language 59(4): 781-819.
  • 2梅祖麟.《从汉代的“动·杀”、“动·死”来看动补结构的发展》[A]..《语言学论丛》第16辑[C].商务印书馆,1991..
  • 3Tai, J. H.-Y. & J. Y. Chou 1975. On the equivalent of "kill" in Mandarin Chinese, Journalof the Chinese Language Teachers Association 10(2): 48-52.
  • 4吴福祥.关于动补结构“V死O”的来源[J].古汉语研究,2000(3):44-48. 被引量:36
  • 5Xu, D. 2006. Typological Change in Chinese Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 6杨荣祥.《古汉语中“杀”的语义特征和功能特征》,载《汉语史学报》第2辑,上海教育出版社2002年版,第78页.
  • 7徐丹.从动补结构的形成看语义对句法结构的影响──兼谈汉语动词语义及功能的分化[J].语文研究,2001(2):5-12. 被引量:21
  • 8太田辰夫.2003.《中国语历史文法》,蒋绍愚,许昌华译,北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 9Michaelis, L. A. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion,Cognitive Linguistics 15(1): 1-67.
  • 10蒋绍愚.2003.魏晋南北朝的“述宾补”式述补结构,《国学研究》第十二卷,北京大学出版社.

二级参考文献68

共引文献227

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部