摘要
《中图法》第5版音乐类目的修订基于增设类目、修订类名、增补修改注释、删除/停用类目等多个方面,但在音乐理论类目的细化、音乐作品类目内容与形式的统一等颇受音乐专业图书馆关注问题的修订方面,仍然存在不足或缺失。建议修订工作借鉴《中图法》第3版音乐类目表成功修订的经验,使《中图法》音乐类目表真正成为一部能够全面、正确反映音乐艺术科学特点、具有长期稳定性的统一的音乐文献分类标准。
The 5th "Chinese Library Classification" (CLC) revision on the music class is based on adding categories, revising class names, mending and changing the notes and deleting or stop-using categories etc. However, there are much shortcomings or inadequate on the detailed categories in music theory, the unity of the content and form of the musical categories and other revision aspects which are particularly con cerned by the music-library professional experts. The writer suggests that we should learn the successsful expricen from the 3rd edition to make the music class of the "CLC" into a music literature classification standard with with uniform and long term stability, which can reflect the scl entific features of the music arts fully and correctly.
出处
《图书馆论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期125-128,共4页
Library Tribune
关键词
《中图法》第5版
音乐类目(J6)
音乐专业图书馆
音乐文献分类
the 5th edition of "Chinese Library Classification"
Music Class (J6)
music library
music literature classification