期刊文献+

利用体外消化率评价青贮品质的问题探讨 被引量:5

Discussion on Silage Quality Evaluation Using In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 饲草青贮后会产生易挥发的发酵产物,在烘干时使干物质损失,从而低估了消化率。采用纤维素酶-胃蛋白酶两级离体消化法测定玉米(Zea maysL.)、羊草(Leymus chinensis Tzvel.)、苜蓿(Medicago sativaL.)的青贮料与其原料的消化率,并进行校正。结果表明:青贮饲料体外干物质消化率的实测值与校正值差异显著,校正后青贮饲料体外干物质体外消化率显著提高,相比之下,玉米青贮饲料提高的幅度更大,9月7日、9月17日收获的玉米分别提高了6.72%和5.63%。7月18日收获的羊草、9月7日收获的玉米、9月24日收获的苜蓿青贮饲料体外干物质消化率的实测值与原料相比均显著降低,但校正后都显著高于原料。8月19日收获的羊草和9月17日收获的玉米青贮饲料体外干物质消化率校正后虽比实测值显著提高,分别提高了2.00%和5.63%,但与原料相比还是显著下降,但降低幅度变小。7月18日收获的羊草和9月24日收获的苜蓿青贮饲料体外干物质校正消化率和原料差异不显著。 The digestibility of silage could be underestimated due to fermentation product volatility.Digestibility of both silage and its crude materials such as corn(Zea mays L.),guineagrass(Leymus chinensis Tzvel.) and lucerne(Medicago sativa L.) using the pepsin-cellulase two-step in vitro technique was studied comparably here.Results indicated that there is significant deference between measured and adjusted IVDMD value of silage.Adjusted IVDMD values of silage are higher than measured ones.The adjusted IVDMD value of corn silage harvested in 7 Sep.and 17 Sep.increased 6.72% and 5.63% compared with measured ones,respectively.The measured IVDMD value of guineagrass silage harvested in 18 July,corn silage harvested in 7 Sep.and lucerne silage harvested in 24 Sep.decreased compared with that of crude materials.But the adjusted values of these silages all were higher than that of crude materials.Although the adjusted IVDMD value of guineagrass silage in 19 August and corn silage in 17 Sep.increased 2.00% and 5.63% compared with measured values,respectively,these values are still lower than that of crude materials.There is no significant deference between adjusted IVDMD value of guineagrass silage in 18 July as well as lucerne silage in 24 Sep.and that of their crude materials.
出处 《草地学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期678-681,共4页 Acta Agrestia Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(30970493)资助
关键词 青贮饲料 品质评价 校正 Silage Evaluate Correction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Tiltey J M, Terry R A. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops [J]. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 1963,18 : 104-111.
  • 2Jones D I H, Hayward M V. A cellulose digestion technique for predicting the dry matter digedtibility of grasses [J]. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture, 1973,24 : 1419-1426.
  • 3Mc Queen R E, Van Soest P J. Fungal cellulase and hemicellu- lase prediction of forage digestibility [J]. Journal of Dairy Sci ence, 1975,58 : 1482-1491.
  • 4周道玮.顶级刍秣:成功的青贮[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
  • 5闫峻,王文杰,高玉鹏,潘振亮,穆淑琴.自动凯氏定氮仪快速测定青贮饲料中的氨态氮[J].粮食与饲料工业,2009(4):47-48. 被引量:19
  • 6De Boever J L, Cottyn B G, Wainman F X,et al. The use of an enzymatic technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable and net energy of compound feedstuffs for ruminants[J]. Ani- mal Feed Science & Technology, 1986,14,203-214.
  • 7许庆方,玉柱,李志强,韩建国,聂志东,孙娟娟,单战.苜蓿、玉米青贮饲料有氧稳定性研究[J].草地学报,2007,15(6):519-524. 被引量:31
  • 8Pitt R E. Silage and hay preservation, northeast regional agricultural engineering service[M]. New York:NRAES and Ithaca,1990. 53.
  • 9Pordesimo L O, Haines B R, Sokhansanj S, et al. Variation in corn stover composition and energy content with crop maturity [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005,28 : 366-374.
  • 10Browne E M, Juniper D T, Bryant M J, et al. Apparent digestibility and nitrogen utilization of diets based on maize silage harvested at three stages of maturity and fed to steers[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2005,60:274-282.

二级参考文献58

共引文献95

同被引文献80

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部