摘要
目的观察和比较两种氟制剂预防正畸牙釉质脱矿的临床效果。方法选择采用固定矫治的正畸患者180例,随机分为3组,第1组:不经任何处理常规进行固定矫治;第2组:使用氟保护漆处理;第3组:使用氟泡沫处理。观察并记录治疗前后3组患者牙釉质脱矿程度。结果第2、3组之间牙釉质脱矿程度无显著性差异(P>0.05),第1组与23、组均存在显著性差异,第2、3组之间牙釉质脱矿程度显著少于第1组(P<0.05)。结论两种氟制剂在正畸治疗中都能够有效的抑制牙釉质脱矿,两者之间抑制牙釉质脱矿的效果没有统计学意义。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical effect of the two kinds of fluoride products to prevent enamel decalcification in orthodontic.Methods The orthodontic fixed appliance 180 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups,Group 1： routine without any fixed appliance treatment,Group 2： Use protective fluoride varnish treatment,group 3： Using the fluoride foam.Results In 3 groups the degree of enamel demineralization 2,3 for the first group has no significant difference,group 1 and 2,3 groups were significantly different.Conclusions The two fluoride preparations in orthodontic treatment can effectively inhibit enamel demineralization,demineralization of enamel between the effect of inhibition there was no significant difference.
出处
《医药论坛杂志》
2011年第12期30-31,共2页
Journal of Medical Forum
关键词
固定矫治器
氟保护漆
氟泡沫
牙釉质
脱矿
Fixed appliance
Fluor protector
Fluoride foam
Enamel
Demineralization
