期刊文献+

静脉溶栓联合早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的荟萃分析 被引量:35

A meta-analysis of early percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours of thrombolysis in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 系统评价静脉溶栓联合早期经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(24 h)的有效性和安全性.方法 计算机检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Elsevier、Cochrane数据库及中国万方、中国知网(CNKI)数据库,收集静脉溶栓联合早期PCI治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的随机对照试验(RCT),2名研究者独立检索和评价相关文献,应用RevMan 5.0和Stata 10.0软件进行数据统计学处理.结果 共纳入8项研究(NORDI-STEMI,TRANSFER-AMI,WEST,CARESS-AMI,CAPITAL-AMI,GRACIA-Ⅰ,SIAMI Ⅲ,PRAGUE-Ⅰ),3157例病人.(1) 溶栓后早期PCI治疗组30d复合终点事件低于对照组(RR=0.52,95%CI 0.42~0.65,P〈0.001);(2)溶栓后早期PCI治疗组30 d非致死性心肌梗死发生率低于对照组(RR=0.57,95%CI 0.40~0.81,P=0.002);(3) 溶栓后早期PCI治疗组30 d再发心肌缺血发生率低于对照组(RR=0.27,95%CI 0.14~0.52,P〈0.001);(4) 溶栓后早期PCI治疗组30 d出血并发症发生率(RR=1.07,95%CI 0.78~1.46,P=0.69)、30d心血管性死亡发生率(RR=0.86,95%CI 0.62~1.20,P=0.38),组间比较差异无统计学意义.结论 静脉溶栓联合早期PCI治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死能够降低30 d复合终点事件、非致死性心肌梗死发生率和再发心肌缺血发生率,而不增加出血和死亡风险. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 24 hours of thrombolysis in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods The databases of Medline, EMBASE, Elsevier, Cochrane library, Wanfang and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trials. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata 10.0 and RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eight studies (NORDI-STEMI, TRANSFER-AMI, WEST, CARESS-AMI, CAPITAL-AMI, GRACIA-Ⅰ, SIAMI Ⅲ & PRAGUE-Ⅰ) involving a total of 3157 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis results showed that, as compared with the control group, (1) the combined endpoint of 30 day mortality, re-infarction and ischemia was significantly lower in early PCI within 24 h of thrombolysis group [relative risk (RR)=0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI)0.42-0.65, P〈0.001]; (2) 30-day re-infarction decreased in early PCI within 24 h of thrombolysis group (RR=0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.81, P=0.002); (3) 30-day ischemia had a significant reduction in early PCI within 24 h of thrombolysis group (RR=0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.52, P〈0.001); (4) 30-day major hemorrhage or mortality rates were not significantly different between two groups (RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.78-1.46, P=0.69; RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.62-1.20, P=0.38 respectively). Conclusion When primary PCI is not feasible, our meta-analysis favors early PCI within 24 h of thrombolysis for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Early PCI is associated with a lowered recurrence of major adverse cardiac events, ischemia and re-infarction. But there is no elevated risk of major hemorrhage and mortality.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第28期1961-1965,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 心肌梗死 血栓溶解疗法 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 荟萃分析 Myocardial infarction Thrombolytic therapy Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17:1-12.
  • 2Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta- analysis. Stat Med, 2002,21:1539-1558.
  • 3Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, et al. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J, 2000.21:823-831.
  • 4] Scheller B, Hennen B, Hammer B, et al. Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coil Cardiol,2003, 42:634-641.
  • 5Femandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, et al. Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia- guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation ( GRACIA-1 ) : a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004,364 : 1045-1053.
  • 6Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, et al. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acutemyocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). J Am Coil Cardiol, 2005,46:417-424.
  • 7Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, et al. Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI) : an open, prospective, randomised, muhicentre trial. Lancet, 2008, 371:559-568.
  • 8Armstrong PW. A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/ without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J, 2006, 27:1530-1538.
  • 9Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, et al. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360:2705-2718.
  • 10Bohmer E, Hoffmann P, Abdelnoor M, et al. Efficacy and safety of immediate angioplasty versus ischemia-guided management after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in areas with very long transfer distances results of the NORDISTEMI ( NORwegian study on District treatment of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coil Cardiol. 2010. 55:102-110.

二级参考文献1

共引文献4

同被引文献323

引证文献35

二级引证文献257

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部