期刊文献+

PPH术与外剥内扎术治疗重度痔的疗效比较 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨PPH术与外剥内扎术治疗重度痔的疗效。方法采用回顾性分析的方法,分析我院收治的重度痔患者临床资料,依据治疗方式不同分为PPH术组与外剥内扎术组。结果 PPH术组手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数均低于外剥内扎术组,PPH术组术后疼痛、便后出血、肛门狭窄、肛门失禁发生率均明显低于外剥内扎术组,提示预后较好。结论 PPH术治疗重度痔临床效果良好,创伤小、恢复快、并发症少,值得临床推广应用。
出处 《中国医药指南》 2011年第22期103-104,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1张鑫麟,陈勇,朱焜.环行混合痔常见并发症的病因和防治[J].河南中医,2005,25(6):56-57. 被引量:34
  • 2应晓江,叶平江,沈毅,王海英.吻合器痔环切术与传统痔切除术临床对照研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2005,14(12):1545-1547. 被引量:14
  • 3《痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)暂行规范》修订[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(4):342-342. 被引量:235
  • 4Thomson WHF.The nature of haemorrhoid[J]. BJ surg, 1975,62:542.
  • 5Longo A.Treament of hemmorhoidal disease by reduction of mucose and hem- morhoidal rrolapse sith a circular stapling device:a new pricedure. [A]//Procedings of the 6 th world congress of endoscopic surgery [ M ].Rom Italy, 1998,3- 4.
  • 6Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomycost and effectiveness: randomiz-ed, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anoreetal manomet ry. and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2000,43(12): 1666.
  • 7Rowsell M.Bello M. Heming way DM. Circumferential mucosectomy(stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus convcntional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2000, 355(6):779.
  • 8Pope V, Doran H, Fearn S, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing quality of life after open hemorrhoidectomy(OH ) plus stapled anopexy ( SA ) [J ]. Dis Colon Rectum,g001,44(4) :5.
  • 9Nagya. Willner P,Jankovieh M, et al. Eight-year experience in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease[J]. Acta Chir Hung,1998,37:71- 76.
  • 10LongoA. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing de vice: a new procedure. Rome, Italy: Proceedings of the 6 th [C]. World Congress of Ensoscopic Surgery, 1998.3.

共引文献29

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部