期刊文献+

动态增强MRI评估糖尿病足足底软组织血流灌注情况 被引量:6

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in evaluating soft tissue blood flow perfusion of sole in diabetic foot
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:初步探讨动态增强MRI评估糖尿病足病患者足底软组织血流灌注的技术方法及应用价值,并分析糖尿病足软组织微循环的病变特征。方法:26例单侧足发病(湿性坏疽12例,干性坏疽4例,混合性坏疽6例,缺血高危足4例)的糖尿病足患者,运用2D FLASH序列行双侧足底软组织单层动态增强MRI检查,对比分析双足动态增强曲线类型及相关指标参数(开始强化时间、强化峰值、10 s及30 s信号改变率)特点及差异。结果:26例患者均顺利完成检查。4种类型糖尿病足双侧动态增强曲线参数(开始强化时间、强化峰值、10 s及30 s信号改变率)的比值(患侧足/非患侧足),湿性坏疽分别为0.97±0.08,1.55±0.66,1.77±0.78和1.21±0.43;混合性坏疽分别为0.98±0.10,1.23±0.37,2.14±1.44和1.54±0.59;干性坏疽分别为1.04±0.06,0.74±0.02,0.62±0.07和0.66±0.02;高危足分别为0.96±0.06,0.88±0.10,0.85±0.11和0.79±0.08。湿性坏疽与混合性坏疽的患侧足强化峰值、10 s及30 s信号改变率较非患侧高,而干性坏疽及高危足的这3项参数值较非患侧低;动态增强曲线类型分布及开始强化时间在患侧足与非患侧足之间均无明显差异。结论:DCE MRI能够评估糖尿病足病足底软组织血流灌注水平,湿性坏疽与混合坏疽患侧足的灌注状况有高于非患侧足的趋势,干性坏疽及缺血性高危足与之相反。 Objective:To study the feasibility and the clinical application of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI(DCE MRI) in the evaluation of soft tissue blood flow perfusion of sole and to analyze the characteristics of the micro-circulation of soft tissue perfusion in diabetic foot.Methods: 26 patients with diabetic foot having single foot involvement including humid gangrene(n=12),dry gangrene(n=4),mixed gangrene(n=6) and high risk ischemic foot(n=4).DCE MRI was performed on bilateral feet with 2D FLASH sequence and single layer of soft tissue of sole were studied.The types of enhancing curve and correlated parameters(initial time of enhancement,peak value of enhancement and the changing rates of signal intensity at 10s and 30s) were calculated and analyzed.Results:All of 26 cases underwent MR examination successfully.The above-mentioned DCE MRI parameters in these 4 types of diabetic foot were displayed.The ratios of these parameters of the affected foot to that of unaffected foot were as follows:For the foot with humid gangrene,which was 0.97±0.08,1.55±0.66,1.77±0.78,1.21±0.43 respectively;for the foot with mixed gangrene was 0.98±0.10,1.23±0.37,2.14±1.44,1.54±0.59 respectively;for the foot with dry gangrene was 1.04± 0.06,0.74±0.02,0.62±0.07,0.66±0.02 respectively;and for the high risk foot was 0.96±0.06,0.88±0.10,0.85±0.11,0.79±0.08,respectively.The peak value of enhancement and the changing rate of signal intensity on 10s and 30s on the affected foot of humid gangrene and mixed gangrene were higher than that of unaffected foot,whereas,they were lower than the unaffected foot in patients with dry gangrene and high risk foot.However,in all types of diabetic foot,there was no significant difference between the enhanced curve patterns and the initial time enhancement.Conclusion:The patterns of blood flow perfusion of soft tissue of sole in diabetic foot could be evaluated by DCE MRI.Foot with humid or mixed gangrene showed a trend towards higher perfusion level than the unaffected foot,while it was just the reverse in foot with dry gangrene or high risk foot.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2011年第7期745-748,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 糖尿病 软组织 足部疾病 磁共振成像 动态对比增强 Diabetic Soft tissue Foot diseases Magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic contrast enhanced
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Zgonis T,Roukis TS. A systematic approach to diabetic foot inlections[J]. Advam Ther, 2005,22(3) : 244-262.
  • 2LoGerfo FW,Gibbons GW. Vascular disease of the lower extremities in diabetes mellitus[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996,25(2) :439-445.
  • 3Duet M,Virally M.Bailliart O,et al. Whole-body scintigraphy can detect exercise lower limb perfusion abnormalities in asymptomatic diabetic patients with normal Doppler pressure indices[J]. Nucl Med Commun,2001,22(9) :949-954.
  • 4Kramer CM. Peripheral arterial disease assessment: wall, perfusion,and spectroseopy[J]. TMRI,2007,18(5) :357-369.
  • 5Jager HR,Waldman AD, Benton C, et al. Differential chemosensitivity of tumor components in a malignant oligodendroglioma : assessment with diffusion-weighted, perfusion-weighted, and serial volumetric MR imaging[J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2005,26 (2) : 274-278.
  • 6Isbell DC, Epstein FH,Zhong X, et al. Calf muscle perfusion at peak exercise in peripheral arterial disease:measurement by firspass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007,25(5) : 1013-1020.
  • 7De Lussanet QG, van Golde JC, Beets Tan RG, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of muscle perfusion combined with MR angiography of collateral artery growth in a femoral artery ligation model[J]. NMR Biomed,2007,20(8) :717-725.

同被引文献95

  • 1梁英明,范义湘,周琳,黄凯.^(99m)Tc-MDP骨显像评价糖尿病足下肢血流改变[J].第一军医大学学报,2004,24(6):691-693. 被引量:1
  • 2Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women inChina[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(12):1090-1101.
  • 3Li X, Welch E B, Arlinghaus L R, et al. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE MRI parameters using individu- al and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer[J]. Phys Med Biol,2011,56(17) :5753-5769.
  • 4Pang C, Jia L, Jiang S, et al. Determination of diabetic retinopa thy prevalence and associated risk factors in Chinese diabetic and pre diabetic subjects: Shanghai diabetic complications study [J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2012,28(3):276-283.
  • 5Xu J, Wei W B, Yuan M X, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: the Beijing Communities Diabetes Study 6 [J]. Retina, 2012,32(2):322-329.
  • 6Trick G L, Liggett J, Levy J, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in patients with diabetic macular edema: initial results[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2005, 81(1):97-102.
  • 7Trick G L, Edwards P A, Desai U, et al. MRI retinovascular studies in humans: research in patients with diabetes[J]. NMR Biomed, 2008, 21(9):1003-1012.
  • 8Berkowitz B A, Roberts R, Luan H, et al. Dynamic contrast-en- hanced MRI measurements of passive permeability through blood retinal barrier in diabetic rats [J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004, 45(7) :2391-2398.
  • 9Berkowitz B A, Gradianu M, Bissig D. Retinal ion regulation in a mouse model of diabetic retinopathy: natural history and the effect of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase overexpression[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei, 2009, 50(5):2351-2358.
  • 10Kim S H, Galban C J, Lutz R J, et al. Assessment of subcon- junctival and intrascleral drug delivery to the posterior segment using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Invest OphthalmolVisSci, 2007 48(2):808-814.

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部