期刊文献+

Mini-Spine牵开器在椎旁肌间隙入路腰椎融合术中应用的初步研究 被引量:5

Preliminary study for the application of the Mini-Spine retractor in the paravertebral muscle space approach of lumbar fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Mini-Spine牵开器在椎旁肌间隙入路腰椎融合术中的应用。方法 2008-06-2008-12间,采用Mini-Spine牵开器治疗腰椎间盘突出患者13例,男8例,女5例,平均年龄47岁。病变均为单节段,其中L4-5椎间盘突出并腰椎不稳症4例,L4-5椎间盘突出并单侧侧方型椎管狭窄症3例,L5-S1极外侧椎间盘突出症1例,L5-S1椎间盘突出并腰椎不稳症3例,L5-S1椎间盘突出并单侧侧方型椎管狭窄症2例。术前患者主要症状表现为腰痛伴一侧下肢放射性疼痛。其中1例极外侧椎间盘突出症患者行微创TLIF术,其余12例患者均行微创PLIF手术。结果患者手术时间为90~150 min,平均104 min,出血量50~200 ml,平均122 ml。患者术后症状均得到明显缓解。术后第1天腰痛VAS评分1~3分,平均1.7分;术后第2天腰痛VAS评分1~3分,平均1.5分,术后均未服用止痛药物。术后3~6 d下地活动,平均4.1 d,住院时间5~9 d,平均6.3 d。结论应用Mini-Spine牵开器进行椎旁肌间隙入路的腰椎融合术具有创伤小、患者术后疼痛轻、恢复快的优点,在治疗腰椎疾病时具有一定的优势。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the application for Mini-Spine retractor in the paravertebral muscle space approach of lumbar fusion.Methods From June 2008 to December 2008,13 cases with lumbar disc herniation underwent the Mine-Spine retractor were reviewed.There were 8 males and 5 females,with a mean age of 47 years.Lesions were single segment.There were 4 cases of L4-5 disc herniation and lumbar instability,3 cases with L4-5 disc herniation and unilateral lateral spinal stenosis,1 case with L5-S1 extreme lateral disc herniation,3 cases L5-S1 disc herniation and lumbar instability,2 cases L5-S1 disc herniation and unilateral lateral spinal stenosis.The main preoperative symptoms of patients were low back pain with radiation of lower extremity pain in one side.The patient who was extreme lateral disc herniation underwent minimally invasive TLIF technique,and the remaining 12 patients underwent minimally invasive PLIF surgery.Results Operative time ranged from 90~150 minutes,averaging 104 minutes.Blood loss was 50~200 ml,an average of 122 ml.Patients' symptoms had been significantly reduced.VAS score of low back pain ranged 1~3 points(with an average of 1.7 points)in the first day after surgery,and the VAS score of low back pain in the second day after surgery were 1-3 points with an average of 1.5 points,postoperative analgesic drugs were not used.Inambulation were 3-6 days(an average of 4.1 days)postoperatively.The hospital stay were 5~9 days with an average of 6.3 days.Conclusion The application for Mini-Spine retractor in the paravertebral muscle space approach of lumbar fusion has advantages of less trauma,reduced postoperative pain and quick restoration in patients.
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2011年第4期250-253,共4页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 微创 腰椎 椎间融合术 Minimally invasive lumbar spine lumbar fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1胡万坤,贺石生,李明.极外侧入路腰椎椎间融合术[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(8):634-635. 被引量:8
  • 2刘彦斌,贺石生,李明.微创腰椎融合术的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(5):395-398. 被引量:15
  • 3韩凯伟,贺石生,侯铁胜.腰椎管狭窄症的微创手术治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(17):1311-1313. 被引量:10
  • 4Kawaguchi Y,Matsui H,Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after pos- terior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2:Histologic and histochemieal analyses in humans[J]. Spine, 1994,19(22):2598-2602.
  • 5Kawaguchi Y,Matsui H,Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after pos- terior lumbar spine surgery. Part 1: Histologic and histochemi- cal analyses in rats[J]. Spine,1994,19(22):2590-2597.
  • 6Kawaguehi H,Kurokawa T, Hoshino Y,et al. Immunohisto- chemical demonstration of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta in the ossification of the poste rior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine[J]. Spine,1992, 17(3 Suppl):33-S36.
  • 7Gejo R,Matsui H,Kawaguchi Y,et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery[J]. Spine, 1999,24( 10):1023-1028.
  • 8Rantanen J,Hurme M,Falck B,et al. The lumbar multilldus muscle five years after surge~' ibr a lumbar intervertebra! disc herniation[J]. Spine, 1993.18(5 ):568-574.
  • 9Park Y,Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar inter- body fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach[J]. Spine,2007,32(5):537-543.
  • 10Kim DY,Lee SH,Chung SK,et al. Comparision of muhifidusmuscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength:percuta- neous versus open pedicle screw fixation[J]. Spine,2005,1:123- 129.

二级参考文献75

  • 1戴力扬 徐印坎 等.后部结构切除对腰椎稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J].中华外科杂志,1988,26:272-272.
  • 2吴岳嵩.长海医院用腹腔镜行椎间植骨成功.第二军医大学学报,1994,15(1):6-6.
  • 3Mathews HH,Evans MT,Molligan HJ,et al. Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior lumbar interbody fusion:a preliminary review[J].Spine, 1995,20 (16) : 1797-1802.
  • 4Zucherman JF,Zdeblick TA,Bailey SA,et al. Instrumented laparoscopic spinal fusion:preliminary results[J].Spine,1995,24 (20) : 2029-2035.
  • 5Olinger A,Hildebrandt U,Mutschler W,et al.First clinical experience with an endoscopic retroperitoneal approach for anterior fusion of lumbar spine fractures from levels T12 to L5[J]. Surg Endosc, 1999,13(12) : 1215-1219.
  • 6Gazzeri R,Tamorri M,Galarza M,et al. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless approach(BERG) for lumbar interbody fusion :is it a valid alternative to the laparoscopic approach[J] ? Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2007,50 (3) : 150-154.
  • 7Mayer HM.A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].Spine,1997,22(6): 691-700.
  • 8Cragg A,Carl A,Casteneda F,et al. New percutaneous access method for minimally invasive anterior lumbosacral surgery[J].J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004,17 ( 1 ) : 21-28.
  • 9Aryan HE,Newman CB,Gold JJ,et al.Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment:initial clinical and radiographic experience[J].Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2008,51 (4) : 225 -230.
  • 10Pimenta L. Lateral endoscopic transpsoas retroperitoneal approach for lumbar spine surgery [C].Paper presented at: VIII Brazilian Spine Society Meeting.Belo Horizonte,Minas Gerais, Brazil: 2001.

共引文献32

同被引文献62

  • 1王贵清,蔡显义,汤勇智,杨立群,黎昭华,利洪艺.Quadrant微创通道下单切口治疗腰椎间盘突出症伴节段不稳[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(11):3357-3359. 被引量:6
  • 2项良碧,王琪,陈语,于海龙,毕岩,任伟剑,刘军.经Wiltse间隙置入Dynesys系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的随机对照研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(18):50-53. 被引量:3
  • 3陈振,梁思敏,马荣,张惠勇,马宗军,吴鹏,锁志刚,丁小力,丁惠强,戈朝晖.Wiltse入路与后正中入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎间盘疾病的疗效比较[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,35(9):975-979. 被引量:3
  • 4Foley KY,HolIy LT,Sehwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion[J]. Spine,2003,15:26-35.
  • 5Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH,et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixa-tion in lumbar spinal fusion[J]. Spine,2000,25(14): 1843-1847.
  • 6Madma S,Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolat-eral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J]. Spine, 2002,27 ( 14 ) : 1536-1542.
  • 7Humphreys SC,Hodges SD,Patwardhan AG,et al. Comparison ofposterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine, 2001,26(S) : 567-571.
  • 8Wang J,Zhou Y,Zhang ZF,et al. Comparison of one-level mini- mally invasive and open transforaJninal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2[J]. Eur Spine J,2010,19( 10): 1780-1784.
  • 9Kim KT,Lee SH,Suk KS,et al. The quantitative analysis of tis- sue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion [J]. Spine, 2006,31(6):712-716.
  • 10Musacchio M,Patel N,Bagan B,et al. Mnimally invasive lumbar laminectomy via a dualtube technique: evaluation in a cadaver m odel[J]. Surgeurol, 2007,67(4) : 348-352.

引证文献5

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部