期刊文献+

拔牙与非拔牙的骨性安氏Ⅲ类双颌手术前后的硬组织变化 被引量:1

Hard tissue changes between extraction-and nonextraction-group in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion by orthognathic treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨已行双颌手术的骨性安氏Ⅲ类错患者治疗前、正颌手术前正畸后和治疗完成后拔与不拔上颌第一前磨牙的上、下颌骨硬组织结构差异。方法:研究对象为均已行上颌骨Le Fort I型前移和下颌骨矢状劈开后退术的骨性安氏Ⅲ类错畸形伴上颌骨发育不足和下颌骨发育过度的患者。研究对象被分成两组:术前正畸拔除上颌第一前磨牙组15例,未拔牙组16例。摄取治疗前(T1)、正颌手术前正畸后(T2)、治疗完成后(T3)的头颅侧位定位片分析测量9个指标值,采用SAS 8.02软件包对数据进行团体t检验。结果:治疗前(T1)拔牙与非拔牙组上牙槽角(SD-SN)有显著差异(P<0.05)。正颌手术前正畸后(T2)下中切牙角(L1-MP)和覆盖有显著差异(P<0.05)。治疗后(T3)下中切牙角(L1-MP)有显著差异(P<0.05)。其他各测量项目均无统计学差异,P>0.05。结论:拔牙组在治疗前骨组织的结构形态上上牙槽骨较非拔牙组更前突,通过术前拔牙正畸内收上前牙长轴后得以改善。正颌手术前正畸后拔牙组下前牙去代偿较非拔牙组更明显,下前牙更直立。 PURPOSE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the hard tissue changes between extraction-and nonextraction-group in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion before and after orthognathic treatment.METHODS:Thirty-one patients with maxillary hypoplasia and mandibular prognathism were divided into two groups:a group that consisted of 15 cases with extraction of maxillary premolar and a group that consisted of 16 cases without extraction.All patients were performed maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy(SSRO).Data were collected from standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs taken at pretreatment(T1),preoperation(T2) and the completion of treatment(T3).Cephalometric analysis included 9 patients.The data were compared at T1,T2 and T3,respectively,with SAS8.02 software package for grouped t test.RESULTS:There was no significant difference in hard tissue morphology at T1,T2,T3 between extraction-and nonextraction-group(P0.05),except upper alveolar anglar(UD-SN) at T1,overjet at T2,L1-MP at T2 and T3(P0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Before treatment,upper anterior alveroar bone in extraction group protruded more than nonextraction-group.By extraction and preoperative orthodontic treatment,protrusion was improved before orthognathic surgery.Decompensation of lower incisor in extraction group was greater than nonextraction-group by increasing reverse overjet.
作者 张桦 杜越英
出处 《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2011年第4期323-326,共4页 China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
基金 上海高校创新团队发展计划资助~~
关键词 骨性安氏Ⅲ类错 头影测量 拔牙 正颌手术 Skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion Cephalometric analysis Extraction Orthognathic surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Lin SS, John W. Soft and hard tissue changes in Class IU patients treated by bimaxillary surgery[J]. Eur Orthodontics, 1998, 20(1):25-33.
  • 2Rivera SM, Hatch JP, Dolce C, et al. Patients' own reasons and patient-perceived recomendations for orthognathic surgery[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000,118(2): 134-141.
  • 3Zaher AR, Bishara SE, Jakobsen JRC. Posttreatment changes in different facial types [J]. Angle Orthod,1994, 64(6): 425-436.
  • 4Tateishi C, Moriyama K, Yamamoto TF. Dentocraniofacial morphology of 12 Japanese subjects with unilateral cleft and palate with a severe class m malocclusion: A cephalometric study at the pretreatment stage of surgical orthodontic treatment[J]. J Cleft Palate- Craniofae, 2001, 38(6): 597-605.
  • 5Islam R, Kitahara T, Naher L, et al. Lip morphological changes in orthodontictreatment [J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(2): 256-264.
  • 6Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119(5):464-471.
  • 7Yavuz B, Hahcoglu K, Ceylan I. Fance mask therapy effects in two skeletal maturation groups of females subjects with skeletal Class m maloclusions[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(2): 256-264.
  • 8Boley JC, Pontier JP, Smith S, et al. Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patient[J]. Angle Orthod, 1998, 68(6):539-546.
  • 9唐国华,张蕾,许晓岑,李晅,储沨婷.Damon技术非拔牙矫治牙列拥挤的适应证分析[J].上海口腔医学,2008,17(4):364-371. 被引量:19
  • 10Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction mad nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patient[J]. Angle Orthod, 2000, 70(1):3-10.

二级参考文献19

共引文献21

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部