期刊文献+

新生隐球菌格鲁比变种临床株与环境株微卫星基因型的小鼠毒力实验研究 被引量:5

Virulence analysis between environmental and clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii based on microsatellite patterns
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解巴西新生隐球菌格鲁比变种(C.neoformans var.grubii)多位点微卫星定型( multilocus microsatllite typing, MLMT)在临床和环境中的分布特点,探讨不同微卫星型的新生隐球菌格鲁比变种临床株和环境株的毒力差异。方法根据多位点微卫星分型技术对分离自巴西的40株(17株临床株和23株环境株)新生隐球菌格鲁比变种进行分型,筛选出临床株及环境株中分布占优势的菌株,应用小鼠毒力试验分别对其进行毒力检测,通过发病情况及病理切片比较毒力差异。结果40株格鲁比变种共鉴定出11种微卫星型,临床株中的优势菌株为MLMT-13型,共9株,占临床株的52.9%(9/17),环境株中的优势菌株为MLMT-36型,共10株,占环境株的43.5%(10/23);小鼠毒力试验结果显示MLMT-13型感染小鼠后发病率为100%,而MLMT-36型发病率为7.5%,且病理结果也存在明显差异。结论格鲁比变种在从环境迁徙到宿主的过程中,毒力随环境的变化发生了改变,该变化也可在其微卫星重复序列上体现出来。该实验证明新生隐球菌格鲁比变种的分布及来源与微卫星型之间存在相关性,临床株MLMT-13型和环境株MLMT-36型之间存在着显著毒力差异。 Objective To investigate the genetic relation between Cryptococcus neoforrnans var. grubii clinical and environmental isolates in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and to test the virulence difference between theclinical strains in MLMT - 1 3 genotype and the environmental strains in MLMT - 3 6 genotype . Methods Multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT) method was applied for the genotype analysis in our study. Through this method, we recognized two genotypes that distinguish a majority of clinical and environmental strains. In order to compare virulence between the two types, we chose to infect BALB/c mice (6 weeks, female) with 9 MLMT-13 strains and 10 MLMT-36 strains intravenously. Results Forty( 17 clinical and 23 environmental isolates) were analyzed. Of 17 clinical strains, 9 belonged to a major type of MLMT-13 (52.9%). They were mainly isolated from clinical specimens. About 43.5% of strains from the environ- ment belong to a major type of MLMT-36, which are indigenous to environments and which were not isolated from clinical samples. The mortality rate and pathological changes of the above mice were observed during two months after injection. The results showed that the mortality rate of mice infected with MLMT-13 strains was 100%, while the mortality rate with MLMT-36 strains was 7.5%. The pathological sections showed that lesions of MLMT-13 infected mice appeared in the brain, lungs, liver and kidneys, while the lesions of MLMT-36 infected mice only appeared in the brain. Most brains of MLMT-13 infected mice were distorted, and both the number and size of lesions in such brains were much larger than those of MLMT-36 infected mice. Conclusion Our study illustrated the virulent difference between MLMT-13 and MLMT-36, which are isolated from patients and environment respectively. The results inferred that some genetic changes, such as microsatellite repeats, might occur between environmental and clinical isolates through their environmental adaptation progress.
出处 《中华微生物学和免疫学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期577-581,共5页 Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
基金 国家自然基金地方项目(31060006号) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(教外司留[2010]1561号) 贵州省科技厅国际科技合作项目(黔科合外G字[2009]700114号) 贵阳医学院院博士启动基金(C2009-3)
关键词 新生隐球菌格鲁比变种 多位点微卫星分型 小鼠毒力试验 C. neoformans var. grubii Multilocus microsatellite typing Virulence test, mice
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Sorrell TC. Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii. Med Mycol, 2001, 39(2): 155-168.
  • 2Casadevall A, Perfect JR. Cryptococcus neoformans. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 1998: 6.
  • 3Hanafy A, Kaocharoen S, Jover-Botella A, et al. Multilocus mic- rosatellite typing for Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii. Med Mycol, 2008, 46(7): 685-696.
  • 4Bicanic T, Harrison TS. Cryptococcal meningitis. Br Med Bull, 2005, 72: 99-118.
  • 5Artaro C, John R. Cryptococcus neoformans. USA: AMS Press, 1998 : 145-168.
  • 6Speed BR, Dunt D. Clinical and host differences between infec- tious with two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Infect Dis, 1995, 21 ( 1 ) : 28-34.
  • 7Dromer F, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Launay O, et al. Determinants of disease presentation and outcome during cryptococcosis: the CryptoA/D study. PLoS Med, 2007, 2(4) : 297-308.
  • 8Katsu M, Kidd S, Ando A, et al. The internal transcribed spacer and 5.8S rRNA gene show extensive diversity among isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. FEMS Yeast Res, 2004, 4(4-5) : 377-388.
  • 9Zhu J, Kang Y, Uno J, et al. Comparison of genotypes betweenenvironmental and clinical isolates of Crytococcus neoformans var. grubii based on microsatellite pattens. Mycopathologia, 2010, 169( 1 ) : 47-55.
  • 10朱键,刘莹,大楠悦子,三上襄.中国和巴西临床新生隐球菌格鲁比变种菌株的种群和基因型比较分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2010,32(3):206-209. 被引量:1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Currie B P, Casadevall A. Estimation of the prevalence of cryptoeoecal infection among patients infected with the human immunodeficieney virus in New York City[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1994, 19 (6) : 1029 - 1033.
  • 2Casadevall A, Perfect J R. Cryptococcus neoformans [ M ]. Washington: ASM Press, 1998 : 41 -70.
  • 3Imai T, Watanabe K, Tamura M, et al. Geographic grouping of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii by random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprint patterns and ITS sequence divergence[ J]. Clin Lib, 2000, 46(7 -8) : 345 -354.
  • 4Levitz S M. The ecology of Cryptococcus neoformans and epidemiology of cryptococcosis[J]. Rev Infect Dis, 1991, 13(6): 1163-1169.
  • 5Bretagne S, Costa J M, Besmond C, et al. Microsatellite polymorphism in the promoter sequence of the elongation factor 3 gene of Candida albicans as basis for a typing system [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol, 1997, 35 (7) : 1777 -1780.
  • 6Hanafy A, Kaocharoen S, Jover-Botella A, et al. Multilocus microsatellite typing for Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii[J]. Med Mycol, 2008, 46(7) : 685 -696.
  • 7Jian N, Wickes B L, Keller S M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of clinical Cryptococcus neoformans strains from India[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2005, 43 ( 11 ) : 5733 - 5742.
  • 8Meyer W, Castaneda A, Jackson S, et al. Molecular typing of IberoAmerican Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates [ J ]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2003, 9(2) : 189 -195.
  • 9Viviani M A, Cogliati M, Esposto M C, et al. Molecular analysis of 311 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from a 30-month ECMM survey of cryptococcosis in Europe [ J ]. FEMS Yeast Res, 2006, 6 ( 4 ) : 614 -619.
  • 10Tintelnot K, Lemmer K, Losert H, et al. Follow-up of epidemiological data of cryptococcosis in Austria , Germany and Switzerland with special focus on the characterization of clinical isolates[ J]. Mycoses, 2004, 47(11 -12) : 455 -464.

共引文献1

同被引文献48

  • 1Kwon-Chung KJ, Varma A. Do major species concepts support one, two or more species within Cryptococcus neoformans? [ J]. FEMS Yeast Res, 2006, 6(4) : 574-587.
  • 2Lin X, Heitman J. The biology of the Cryptococcus neoformans spe- cies complex[ J ]. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2006, 60: 69-105.
  • 3Boekhout T, Theelen B, Diaz M, et al. Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans [ J ]. Microbiology, 2001, 147(Pt4) : 891-907.
  • 4Antinori S. New insights into HIV/AIDS-associated cryptococcosis [ J]. ISRN AIDS, 2013, 2013 : 471363.
  • 5Hanafy A, Kaocharoen S, Jover-Botella A, et al. Multilocus mic- rosatellite typing for Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii[ J ]. Med Mycol, 2008, 46(7): 685-696.
  • 6Zhu J, Kang Y, Uno J, et al. Comparison of genotypes between environmental and clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii based on microsatellite patterns[ J ]. Mycopathologia, 2010, 169(1) : 47-55.
  • 7Liu OW, Chun CD, Chow ED, et al. Systematic genetic analysis of virulence in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans [J]. Cell, 2008, 135(1) : 174-188.
  • 8Mueller TD, Feigon J. Structural determinants for the binding of ubiquitin-like domains to the proteasome[ J]. EMBO J, 2003, 22 (18) : 4634-4645.
  • 9Mueller TD, Feigon J. Solution structures of UBA domains reveal a conserved hydrephobic surface for protein-protein interactions [J]. J Mol Biol, 2002, 319(5) : 1243-1255.
  • 10Wilkinson CR, Seeger M, Hartmann-Petersen R, et al. Proteins containing the UBA domain are able to bind to muhi-ubiquitin chains[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2001, 3(10) : 939-943.

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部