期刊文献+

核素淋巴造影和动态磁共振淋巴造影诊断肢体淋巴水肿的比较研究 被引量:8

Comparison study of radionuclide iymphoscintigraphy and dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography for the diagnosis of extremity lymphedema
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较核素淋巴造影与磁共振淋巴造影对肢体淋巴水肿的诊断作用.方法 18例肢体淋巴水肿患者分别接受了^99Tc-标记的右旋糖酐为造影剂的核素淋巴造影和钆贝葡胺为显影剂的核磁共振淋巴造影检查,从淋巴系统的形态和功能显像结果对2种方法进行了比较.结果 18例中磁共振淋巴造影清晰显示14例患肢的淋巴管,核素淋巴造影只显示1例.磁共振淋巴造影显示16例患肢的腹股沟淋巴结,核索淋巴造影只显示9例.磁共振淋巴造影通过对造影剂的实时追踪能够提供详尽的淋巴系统病变信息.结论 动态磁共振淋巴造影能够更精确和敏感地检测淋巴水肿肢体的淋巴管、淋巴结结构和功能的病变. Objective To compare the role of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic magnetic resonance lymphangiography ( MRL) for the diagnosis of extremity lymphedema. Methods Sixteen patients with primary extremity lymphedema and two with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome combined with lymphedema were examined by lymphoscintigraphy using the tracer ^99Tc-labelled dextran, and also by MRL using gadobenate dimeglumine as contrast agent. The results of morphological abnormalities and functional state of the lymphatic system at affected limbs from the two imaging methods were compared. Results Lymphatic vessels were imaged in 14 of 18 limbs with lymphedema using MRL, compared with one of 18 using lymphscintigraphy. MRL detected the inguinal nodes in 16 of 17 patients, whereas lymphscintigraphy revealed inguinal nodes in only nine cases. MRL revealed more precise information about structural and functional abnormalities of lymph vessels and nodes than lymphoscintigraphy by real-time measurement of lymph flow in vessels and nodes. Conclusions Dynamic MRL is more sensitive and accurate than lymphoscintigraphy in the detection of anatomical and functional abnormalities in the lymphatic system in patients with extremity lymphedema.
出处 《中华整形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期241-245,共5页 Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
基金 上海市科委基金项目(09410706400,1041964100,1044071000)
关键词 淋巴水肿 淋巴造影术 放射性同位素 磁共振成像 Lymphedema Lymphography Radioisotopes Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Sherman DC, Ter-Pogossian M. Lymph node concentration of radioactive colloidal gold following interstitial injection. Cancer, 1953, 6(6) : 1238-1245.
  • 2Liu N, Wang C, Sun M. Noneontrast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging vs lymphoseintigraphy in the evaluation of lymph circulation disorders: a comparative study. J Vasc Surg, 2005,41 ( 1 ) : 69-75.
  • 3Barrett T, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Imaging of tile lymphatic system: new horizons. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2006, 1 (6) : 230-245.
  • 4Liu NF, Lu Q, Wang CG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a new method to diagnose protein losing enteropathy. Lym ohology, 2008,41(3): 111-115.
  • 5Liu NF, Lu Q, Jiang ZH, et al. Anatomic and functional evaluation of the lymphatics and lymph nodes in diagnosis of lymphatic circulation disorders with contrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography. J Vase Surg, 2009,49(4): 980-987.
  • 6Lu Q, Xu J, Liu N. Chronic' lower extremity lymphedema: a eumparative study of high-resolulion interstitial MR lymp- hangiography and heavily T2-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol,2010,73(2): 365-373.
  • 7Stanton AW, Svensson WE, Mellor RH, et al. Differences in lymph drainage between swollen and non-swollen regions in arms with breast-cancer-related lymphoedema. Clin Sei (Lond), 2001,101(2) : 131-140.
  • 8Kinmnnth JB. Lymphangiography in man; a method of outlining lymphatic trunks at operation. Clin Sei (Lond) , 1952, 11 ( 1 ) : 13-20.
  • 9Kinmonth .!lB. The lymphatics, diseases, lymphography, and surgery. Williams &Wilkins: Baltimore, 1972:235-250.
  • 10Kinmonth JB, Eustaee PW. Lymph nodes and vessels in primary lympt*oedema. Their relative importance in aetiology. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 1976, 58(5) : 278-284.

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部