期刊文献+

国外医院绩效评价的比较分析与对我国的启示 被引量:47

A Comparative Analysis of Hospital Performance Evaluation Overseas and it Implications for China
原文传递
导出
摘要 医院绩效评价已在各国的卫生系统得到普遍认可。许多国家都建立了医院绩效评价指标,开展了绩效评价工作。但因国情与制度不同,各国的绩效评价方案也有所不同。通过从评价维度、结果反馈与应用方面对英国、美国、澳大利亚、荷兰的医院绩效评价方案和WHO在欧洲实施的绩效评价项目进行归纳与分析,总结其医院绩效评价方面的特点,为我国医院绩效评价提供可供借鉴的经验。 Hospital performance evaluation has been widely recognized in health system. Many countries have established performance indicators and carry out evaluation, and their performance evaluation plans are different for their different national circumstances and institutions. The paper makes comparative analysis of the evaluation dimensions and feedback mechanism in UK, US, Australia,Netherlands and WHO performance assessment in Europe, summarizes their characteristics to offer implications for us.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2011年第8期70-72,共3页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金(71073044) 国家自然科学基金(70903019) 黑龙江省教育厅人文科学项目(11542127) 美国中华医学会基金会(09-979) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20102307110018)
关键词 医院绩效 绩效评价 评价维度 反馈机制 hospital performance performance evaluation evaluation dimension feedback ,nechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1姜福康,高录涛,王军.实施绩效管理 推动医院快速可持续发展[J].中国卫生经济,2009,28(5):54-56. 被引量:18
  • 2] A review of the determinants of hospital performance[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization Hospital Advisory Group,1994.
  • 3Gould M.NHS star rating system is misleading, statisticians say[J]. BMJ. 2003,327(7422):1008.
  • 4Hurst J, M Jec-Hughes. Performance measuremeni and performance management in OECD health[Z]. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, 2001.
  • 5Berg M, Gras Y. Feasibility first: Developing public peribrmanee indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals[J]. Health Policy, 2005(75):59-73.
  • 6The National Health Performance Committee. National Health Per- formance framework report[R]. Brisbane:Queensland Heahh,2001. What makes PATH different?[EB/OL].[2010-12-25].http://www pathqualityproject.eu/what_makes_path_different.htrnl.
  • 7What makes PATH different?[EB/OL].[2010-12-25].http://www. pathqualityproject.eu/what_makes_path_different.html.
  • 8李玲.权威解析:公立医院管理与考核的国际经验[J].医院领导决策参考,2010(16):39-44. 被引量:1
  • 9马晓静,王小万.国际卫生服务系统绩效评价框架与趋势比较研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2009,2(7):52-56. 被引量:11
  • 10谢钢,王辉,林琦远.公立医院绩效考核的现状与对策[J].现代医院管理,2009,7(4):1-4. 被引量:45

二级参考文献20

共引文献110

同被引文献356

引证文献47

二级引证文献233

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部