期刊文献+

无语境条件下网络歧义词的意义激活

下载PDF
导出
摘要 以120名熟悉网络语言的大学生为被试,采用词汇判断任务,在孤立词条件下考察网络歧义词不同意义激活的时间进程特点,结果显示网络歧义词的两种意义都能被激活。其意义激活过程表现出不同的时间进程特点:黑色背景下,原本意义先激活,网络意义后激活;网络背景下,网络意义先激活,原本意义后激活。结果表明:在网络歧义词加工的过程中,相对频率对意义激活有重要作用。
作者 沈潘艳
出处 《西南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第8期51-55,共5页 Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Swinney D A. Lexical access during sentence compre hension (Re) consideration of context effects[J]. Jour- nal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979 (18) :645--659.
  • 2Kintsch W, Moross E F. Context e{fects in word identi fieation[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1985 (24) :336--349.
  • 3Simpson G B. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexieal ambiguity[J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20 ( 1 ) .. 120--136.
  • 4Van Patten C, Kutas M. Ambiguous words in context: an event-related potential analysis of the time course of mean ing activation [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1987,26(2) : 188--208.
  • 5Martin C, Vu H, Kellas G. etal. Strength of context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect[J]. Quar terly Journal of Experiment Psychology, 1999 (4) : 813--839.
  • 6Keith R, Lyn F. Selection mechanisms in reading lexi eally ambiguous words [J]. Journal of Experiment Psyehology~ Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1989, 15(5) :779--790.
  • 7Duffy S A, Morris R K, Rayner K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988 (27) : 429 -- 446.
  • 8Sereno S C. Resolution of lexical ambiguity: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm[J]. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 1995,21(3) :582--595.
  • 9张亚旭 舒华.词汇歧义消解的认知研究,理论、方法与现状[J].北京师范大学学报,2000,5:96-101.
  • 10张亚旭,舒华,张厚粲.汉语句子理解中同形异义词意义通达的时间进程.黄昌宁,董振东主编.计算语言学文集.清华大学出版社,1999:81-88

二级参考文献103

  • 1尹文刚.汉字同音率、同音度及同音字音节个数随同音度增加而递减的规律[J].语言科学,2003,2(4):3-6. 被引量:13
  • 2武宁宁,舒华.无语境条件下汉语词类歧义词的意义激活[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):305-311. 被引量:14
  • 3胡志伟 陈贻照 张世华 宋永麒.中文多字多义词自由联想常模[J].中华心理学刊,1996,38.
  • 4Swinney D A. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)Consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979, 18: 645~659
  • 5Tanenhaus M K, Leiman J M, Seidenberg M S. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979, 18: 427~440
  • 6Onifer W, Swinney D A.. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 1981, 9(3): 225~236
  • 7Seidenberg M S, Tanenhaus M K, Leiman J M, Bienkowski M. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14: 489~537
  • 8Simpson G B. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981, 20(1):120~136
  • 9Simpson G B, Kreuger M A. Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 1991, 30(6):627~643
  • 10Simpson G B, Kellas, G. Dynamic contextual processes and lexical access. In: Gorfein D S ed. Resolving semantic ambiguity. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989. 40~56

共引文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部