期刊文献+

Sky型膨胀式椎体成形器治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折 被引量:2

Sky type bone expander system in treatment of patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价Sky型膨胀式椎体成形器治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果。方法对疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者35例(40椎)应用Sky型膨胀式椎体成形器对病椎进行扩张,并用骨水泥填充,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)及Stauffer—Coventry(SC)评定术后疗效。结果本组病例手术均获得成功,椎管内硬膜外渗漏1例,椎间盘渗漏2例,椎弓根穿刺针道渗漏1例,均未引起严重的神经症状及肺栓塞等致命并发症,VAS由术前(7.6±0.6)降到术后(3.1±0.3),随访6个月时为(2.1±0.4),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。临床效果SC评分:优21例,良11例,可3例,优良率91.4%(32/35例)。结论Sky型膨胀式椎体成形器手术创伤小、手术时间短,可迅速有效地缓解疼痛,远期疗效可靠,具有很好的临床应用价值。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of Sky type bone expander system in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Methods Thirty-five patients (40 vertebrae) with painful osteoporotie vertebral compression fracture were treated by vertebral body balloon-type expander to expand the diseased vertebrae,and fill with bone cement. The effects were assessed with VAS and Stauffer-Coventry (SC) before and after the surgery. Results The opera- tions were all successful, spinal epidural leakage in 1 case, disc leakage in 2 cases, pedicle needle channel leakage in 1 cage, but there were no neurological complications. Clinical effects of SC score were excellent in 21 cases, good in 11 cases, rates of excellent and good in 91.4% (32/35 cases). Conclusion The Sky type bone expander system has the advantages of micro-invasive and short operation time. It can be quickly and effectively relieve pain, with long-term and reliable effects.
出处 《实用疼痛学杂志》 2011年第3期183-186,共4页 Pain Clinic Journal
关键词 骨质疏松 脊柱骨折 骨折 压缩性 椎体成形术 SKY膨胀式椎体成形器 骨水泥 Osteoporosis Spinal Fractures Fractures, Compression Kyphoplasty Sky Bone Expander System Bone Cement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1郑召民,李佛保.经皮椎体成形术和经皮椎体后凸成形术——问题与对策[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(27):1878-1880. 被引量:222
  • 2Hardouin P, Grados F, Cotton A, et al. Should percutaneous vertebroplasty be used to treat osteoporotic fractures? An update.J Joint Bone Spine, 2001, 68: 216-221.
  • 3Murphy K J, Deramond H. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in benign and malignant disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2000,10: 535-545.
  • 4Moreland DB, Landi MK, Grand W. Vertebroplasty: techniques to avoid complications. Spine J, 2001, 1: 66-71.
  • 5Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, et al. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.Am J Neuroradiol, 1997, 18: 1897-1904.
  • 6Martin JB, Jean B, Sugiu K, et al. Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results. Bone, 1999, 25: 11S-15S.
  • 7Barr JD, Barr MS, Le mLey TJ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine, 2000, 25:923 -928.
  • 8Tohmen AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vetebroplasty for management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine,1999, 24: 1772-1776.
  • 9Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine, 2001, 26: 1537-1541.
  • 10Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, et al. Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine, 2001, 26:1631-1638.

共引文献87

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部