期刊文献+

超声生物显微镜和房角镜判断窄房角结果一致性分析 被引量:4

Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and gonioscopy for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles on primary angle-closure glaucoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价超声生物显微镜(UBM)和裂隙灯显微房角镜(房角镜)对原发性闭角型青光眼房角检查结果的一致性。方法采用双盲法随机对一组原发性闭角型青光眼患者的前房角分别进行UBM和房角镜检查,收集房角镜下Scheie分级为NⅢ和NⅣ的患眼共102只眼(55例),将其房角镜检查结果与UBM检查结果进行等级相关统计学分析,并建立UBM和房角镜检查结果的判别分析。结果两者的检查结果在上方、鼻侧、下方及颞侧四个方位的检查结果中,鼻侧检查结果的一致性最好(rs=0.694,P〈0.01),其次为上方(rs=0.545,P〈0.01),颞俱II(rs=0.426,P〈0.01),下方的检查结果一致隆最差(rs=0.357,P〈0.01)。建立房角镜与UBM两者的判别分析结果显示,鼻侧、上方、颞侧及下方的回代判别总判别符合率分别为86.3%、81.4%、74.5%及52.9%,交互验证符合率分别86.3%、81.4%、74.5%及52.9%。结论在窄房角的情况下,UBM和房角镜检查的结果在不同方位一致性程度不同。 Objective To assess the consistency of results between ultrasound biomcrioscopy (UBM) and gonioscopy for narrow angle on primary angle-closure glaucoma. Methods UBM and gonioscopy were applied to exam anterior chamber angle on primary angle-closure glaucoma by random- ized double-blind method. 102 eyes (55 cases) with Scheie classification NIII and NIV, were collected and compared the results of UBM. The data were analyzed by Spearman correlation test and discrirninant analysis. Results The results of UBM and gonioscopy on narrow anterior chamber angel were well consistency with nasal (rs=0.694, P 〈0.01), followed by the superior (rs=0.545, P 〈0.01), temporal (rs=0.426, P 〈0.01), respectively, but consistency were not good with inferior (rs=0.357, P 〈0.01), gonioseopy and UBM discriminant analysis showed that nasal, superior, temporal and inferior the generation of discriminant total different compliance rates were 86.3%, 81.4%, 74.5% and 52.9%, consistent with validation were 86.3%, 81.4%, 74.5% and 52.9%. Conclusions The consistency of results between UBM and gonioscopy for narrow anterior chamber angles are different in different direction.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期802-805,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词 青光眼 房角镜 超声生物显微镜(UBM) Glaucoma Gonioscopy Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1M He,PJ Foster,GJ Johnson,et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in East Asian and European people. Different diseases [J] Eye,2006,20:3-12.
  • 2Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin DS,et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore. A cross-sectional population survey in Tanjong Pagar district [J]. Arch Ophtalmol,2000,118: 1105-1111.
  • 3王宁利,欧阳洁,周文炳,赖铭莹,叶天才,曾明兵,陈静嫦.中国人闭角型青光眼房角关闭机制的研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2000,36(1):46-51. 被引量:329
  • 4王宁利,刘文,陈伟蓉,陈静嫦.超声生物显微镜在我国眼科领域的应用研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2001,37(6):471-475. 被引量:42
  • 5刘堃,刘海芸,严正,叶纹,许迅.超声生物显微镜观察房角四度狭窄病例[J].眼科研究,2005,23(3):319-321. 被引量:4
  • 6David S. Friedman,Mingguang He. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques [ J ]. Survey of Ophthalmology, 2008,53 (3) : 250-273.
  • 7张扬,赵家良,杨渊筌.明暗光线下超声活体显微镜检查在发现前房角关闭中的作用[J].中华眼科杂志,2009,45(1):8-13. 被引量:17
  • 8Ramani KK,Mani B,George RJ,et al. Follow-up of primary angle closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy and A-scan biometry for a period of 2 years [J]. Glancoma, 2009,18(7) :521-7.
  • 9Park SW,Heo H,Yang KJ. Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopic changes after glaucoma triple procedure and trabeculectomy in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma [J]. Glaucoma, 2009,18(4) :311-315.
  • 10Hong Y,Zhang C,Wang W. Comment on Effects of phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy on drainage angle status in primary angle closure glaucoma [J]. Glaucoma,2010,19 (3) : 224 : 224-225.

二级参考文献37

  • 1孙兴怀,嵇训传.原发性慢性闭角型青光眼临床规律探讨[J].中华眼科杂志,1993,29(2):76-82. 被引量:19
  • 2王宁利,周文炳,叶天才,吴中耀,刘华.原发性闭角型青光眼的临床研究[J].中华眼科杂志,1995,31(2):133-136. 被引量:102
  • 3王涛.超声生物显微镜在眼前节疾病诊断中的应用[J].国外医学(眼科学分册),1997,21(1):22-27. 被引量:18
  • 4Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol, 1996,80 : 389-393.
  • 5Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol,2000,84:186-192.
  • 6Pavlin C J, Ritch R, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in plateau iris syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol, 1992,113 : 390-395.
  • 7Pavlin C J, Harasiewicz K, Foster FS. An ultrasound biomicmscopic dark-room provocative test. Ophthalmic Surg, 1995,26:253-255.
  • 8Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, et al. Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. BrJ Ophthalmol, 2003,87:450-454.
  • 9Shiho K, Atsuo T, Kouichi M, et al. Prevalence of appositional angle closure determined by ultrasonic biomicroscopy in eyes with shallow anterior chambers. Ophthalmology,2005,112: 407-412.
  • 10Ishikawa H, Esaki K, Liebmann JM, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy dark room provocative testing:a quantitative method for estimating anterior chamber angle width. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 1999,43:526-534.

共引文献378

同被引文献58

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部