期刊文献+

基于主客观赋权和TOPSIS的物流中心规划方案评价 被引量:2

The Evaluation Method for Facilities Planning of Logistics Centre Based on SOSA and TOPSIS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 物流中心设施规划的方案评价是一个多目标决策问题.提出了一种基于主客观赋权(SOSA)和理想点法(TOPSIS)的综合评价方法,能够较好解决物流中心设施规划方案的评价优选问题.根据物流中心设施规划设计的特点和要求,建立综合评价指标体系;应用主客观赋权的方法,确定各指标在综合评价指标体系中的权重;求出各方案相应指标属性值对理想解的相对接近度;通过比较相对接近度的大小,对各个规划方案进行排序优选.应用实例表明该方法是合理有效的. The scheme evaluation for facilities planning of logistics center is a multiobjective decision making problem.Based on SOSA(Subjective and Objective Synthetic Approach) and TOPSIS(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution),a comprehensive evaluation method is brought forward to evaluate the scheme of logistics center's facilities planning.After establishing the evaluation indexes system,ascertaining the indexes' weight by SOSA,calculating the relative approach degree as to the ideal point and negative ideal point,and then the values of these relative approach degree are obtained.Based on the values,the evaluation result and the optimum scheme could be obtained.Case analysis shows that the proposed method is effective and reasonable.
作者 李玉民
出处 《郑州大学学报(工学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第4期42-46,共5页 Journal of Zhengzhou University(Engineering Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70901066) 河南省科技计划资助项目(102400440008)
关键词 物流中心 规划方案 评价 AHP 熵权 TOPSIS logistics center planning scheme evaluation AHP entropy TOPSIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

共引文献141

同被引文献32

  • 1赵凯,王锐兵,王道平.我国石油企业供应链管理模型的构建研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2007(4):68-69. 被引量:6
  • 2邸丛颖,田立新.成品油供应链优化模型研究[J].统计与决策,2007,23(17):56-57. 被引量:7
  • 3唐美丽,马廷淮,卢愿清.基于粗糙集的电子政务绩效评估模型[J].统计与决策,2007,23(15):47-48. 被引量:5
  • 4Sinha A K, Aditya H K, Tiwari M K, Chan F T S. Agent o- riented petroleum supply Chain coordination: Co-evolution- ary particle swarm optimization based approach [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(5) :6132-6145.
  • 5Al-Othman W B E, Lababidi H M S, Alatiqi I M, Al-Shayji K. Supply chain optimization of petroleum organization under uncertainty in market demands and prices [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 189 ( 3 ) : 822-840.
  • 6Yahaya Y Y, Gunasekarah A M, Nagham M E, Tijijani A, Hafsat M A. The UK oil and gas supply chains : An empirical analysis of adoption of sustainable measures and performance outcomes [EB/OL]. International Journal of Production Economics, www. sciencedivect. com/sience/artiul-epii/s0925527312004173, 2012-10-16.
  • 7Ravi V, Reddy P J. Ranking of India coals via fuzzy multi attribute decision making [J]. Fuzzy and Systerm, 1999,103(3) :369-377.
  • 8Zhao H, Wan G, Wei Z. Dynamic engineering multi-criteria decision making model optimized by Entropy Weight for evaluating bid [J]. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2012,5 ( 1 ) :49-54.
  • 9Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business [M]. Oxford: Capstone Publish- ing, 1997.
  • 10李红松.多属性决策客观赋权原理在公路养护中的应用研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2008,30(8):189-192. 被引量:2

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部