期刊文献+

磁力Twin-block矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合] 被引量:2

The clinical investigation of magnetic Twin-block appliance for Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察安氏Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合]患者使用磁力Twin-block矫治器治疗前后牙颌骨结构变化情况.方法 应用磁力Twin-block矫治器和固定矫治器对15例覆盖大于10 mm.替牙晚期或恒牙早期安氏Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合]进行治疗,治疗前后拍摄头颅侧位定位片,分别观测颌骨、牙齿结构的变化,所得结果进行统计学分析.结果 磁力Twin-block治疗前后SNB增加了(1.97 ±1.01)°,ANB减少了(1.94±0.72)°,MP-FH增加了(4.80 ±1.37)°,P〈0.001,对下颌骨的矢状向、垂直向作用更明显,差异有统计学意义.结论 磁力Twin-block矫治器对替牙晚期或恒牙早期安氏Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合]进行治疗,能够促进颌骨特别是下颌骨的改建及侧貌改善. Objective To evaluate the skeletal changes of Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion patients after treatment with magnetic Twin-block appliance. Methods Fifteen Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion patients (late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition) with the overjet more than 10 mm were treated using the magnetic twin-block appliance and fixed appliance. Before and after the treatment, the cephalometric radiographs were taken to observe the structure changes of the jaw and the teeth. The results were statistically analysed. Results Before and after the treatment with magnetic twin-block, SNB is increased by (1.97 ±1.01)°, ANB is decreased by (1.94 ±0.72)°, MP-FH is increased by (4.80 ±1.37)°(P 〈 0.001). The sagittal and vertical effection on the mandible is obvious, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Using magnetic Twin-block appliance on Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion patients in late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition phase, can improve the bone remodeling of jaw (especially the mandible) and facial profile esthetics.
出处 《中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2011年第4期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition)
关键词 磁力Twin-block矫治器 安氏Ⅱ类1分类 头颅侧位 Magnetic Twin-block appliance Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion Cephalometric radiographs
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献20

  • 1吴建勇,刘剑,林久祥.螺旋CT对磁力Twin-block矫治器矫治过程中TMJ变化的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(4):405-408. 被引量:4
  • 2Clark WJ. The twinblock technigue. Am J Orthod 1988; 93: 1.
  • 3Clark WJ. The twinblock traction technigue. Eur J Orthod 1982; 4: 129.
  • 4Hagg U, Tarange J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt.Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 299.
  • 5Clark WJ. The twin block traction technique. Eur J Orthod, 1982,4(2) : 129-138.
  • 6Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,114( 1 ) :15-24.
  • 7Vardimon AD, Stutzmann JJ, Graber TM, et al. Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) Ⅱ:modus operandi. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1989,95 (5) :371-387.
  • 8McNamara JA Jr, Hinton R J, Hoffman DL. Histologic analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptation to protrusive function in young adult rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta). Am J Orthod, 1982,82 (4) :288-298.
  • 9Paulsen HU, Karle A, Bakke M, et al. CT-scanning and radiographic analysis of temporomandibular joints and cephalometric analysis in a case of Herbst treatment in late puberty. Eur J Orthod, 1995,17 (3) : 165-175.
  • 10Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in 'adolescents and young aduhs during Herbst treatment : a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999,115(6) :607-618.

共引文献69

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部