期刊文献+

考虑测试效率的软件可靠性模型研究 被引量:3

Research of Software Reliability Model with Test Efficiency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对软件可靠性模型的研究,主要集中在如何使所建立的模型尽可能地贴近实际情况。目的是提高软件可靠性模型的拟合能力,使可靠性模型能更好地对软件将来的失效行为进行预测。经典非其次泊松过程模型的假设条件都忽略了不完全排错以及排错时引入错误的可能性,也没有考虑到在测试过程中资源投入等问题。笔者认为在测试过程中,投入的资源、测试环境以及测试人员的努力程度对测试的结果有一定的影响。同时,考虑到软件排错过程中新错误的引入和错误的不完全排除等情况,提出了一种考虑测试效率的可靠性模型。通过与已有模型进行仿真试验对比显示,新模型具有更好的拟合性能,具有很好的工程实践意义。 The research of software reliability models focuses on how to make reliability models accord with actual situation.The aim of it is improving the ability of fitting accuracy for software reliability models and predicting the software's fault behavior in the future better.The assumptions of classical non-homogeneous Poisson process models disregard imperfect debugging and the introduction of new errors.In addition,the consumption of resources is not considered either.Think the consumption of resources in test process,test environment,and the input level of tester can affect the results of test.Meanwhile,perfect debugging and imperfect debugging in the test process are also considered,and a new NHPP model with respect to test efficiency is proposed.After contrasting with some released models,the new model shows better performance to fit data and theoretically can be applied into projects.
出处 《计算机技术与发展》 2011年第8期67-70,共4页 Computer Technology and Development
基金 南京邮电大学校科研基金(01院32)
关键词 可靠性模型 非齐次泊松过程 不完全排错 测试效率 reliability model non-homogeneous Poisson process imperfect debugging test efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1邹丰忠,刘海青,王林.软件可靠性综合模型[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2003,36(1):86-88. 被引量:14
  • 2黄锡滋.软件的可靠性与完全性[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
  • 3Huang Chin- Yu, Kuo Sy- Yen, Lyu M R. An Assessment of Testing-Effort Dependent Software Reliability Growth Models [ J ]. IEEE Transaction on Reliability ,2007,56 ( 2 ) : 198-211.
  • 4Huang Chin-Yu, Kuo Sy-Yea, Cben Ing-Yi. Analysis of a Software Reliability Growth Model with Logistic Testing-Effort Funetion[C ]//Proc of 8th International Symposium on Soft- ware Reliability Engineering. [ s. I. ] : [ s. n. ], 1997 : 378 - 388.
  • 5Yamada S. Software-Reliability Growth with a Weibull Test- Effort: A Model & Application [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1993,42 ( 1 ) : 100-106.
  • 6Kuo Sy-Yen, Huang Chin-Yu,Lyu M R. Framework for Modeling Software Reliability, Using Various Testing-Efforts and Fault-Detection Rates [ J ]. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 2001,50(3) :310-320.
  • 7Malaiya Y K, Karunanityi N, Verma P. Predictability measures for software reliability models [ C ]//Proc. 1990 IEEE Int. Computer Software and Applications Conference, Chicago, IL: [s. n. ] ,1990:7-12.
  • 8顾林君.一种错误发现率为时间函数的软件可靠性模型[D].南京:南京邮电大学,2009.
  • 9丁晓光.基于测试覆盖的软件可靠性模型[D].南京:南京邮电大学,2008.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Sarah B, Chan P Y, Bev L, et. al. Recalibrating software reliability models[J]. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 1990, 16(4):458-459.
  • 2Phame H. Reliability Handbook[S]. Springer Verlag, New York, 2002.
  • 3Michael R L, Nikora A. Applying reliability models more effectively[J]. IEEE Software, 1992.45-52.

共引文献13

同被引文献27

  • 1李邵明,郭平.软件可靠性模型选择的理论研究[J].计算机工程与科学,2006,28(z2):59-61. 被引量:3
  • 2MusaJD.软件可靠性工程[M].韩柯,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
  • 3GJB/Z102-97. 软件可靠性和安全性设计准则[S].1997.
  • 4NASA-GB-8719. 13B. Software Safety [ S]. Washington : NASA,2004.
  • 5GJB-900-90.系统安全性通用大纲[S].北京:国家技术工 业委员会,1991.
  • 6Jelinski Z,Moranda P B. Software reliability research[ M]./ Statistical computer performance evaluation. New York : Academic Press, 1972 :465 -484.
  • 7John D M. Software Reliability Engineering[ M].北京:机械 工业出版社,2003.
  • 8Ericson C A. Hazard analysis technique for system safety[ M]. Hoboken(USA) : John Wiley & Sons Inc ,2005.
  • 9李烈彪,李仙.计算机系统的可靠性技术[J].计算机技术与发展,2007,17(11):142-144. 被引量:10
  • 10Gallagher M, Narasimhan V L. ADTEST:A test data genera- tion suite for Ada software systems [ J ]. IEEE transactions on software engineering, 1997,23 ( 8 ) :473-484.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部