期刊文献+

略论患者知情同意权的侵权责任法救济 被引量:2

Relief of the Right of Informed Consent on Tort Liability Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知情同意权是保障患者人格受尊重,行使自主决定权的重要方式,本质上应该属于人格权的范畴,在我国法律没有明确确认其为独立的人格权之前,不妨将其作为一般人格权进行保护。患者知情同意权本质上不仅仅是一种人格权还属于人权的范畴。侵害知情同意权的侵权责任本质上属于一般侵权责任,其归责原则并无特殊性。侵害知情同意权的侵权责任的构成要件有:违法行为,损害事实,违法行为和损害之间的因果关系,过错。 The right of informed consent is an important way of ensuring patient's personality is respected and exercising self-determination.It is one type of personality in essence;it might as well be a good way to protect it as general personality before our country's laws admit it as an independent personality.Tort liability of infringing right of informed consent belongs to general tort class essentially,its imputation has nothing particularity.The elements of tort liability of infringing right of informed consent's are: illegal behavior;damage facts;the causal relationships between illegal behavior and damage;fault.
作者 管洪彦
出处 《医学与社会》 2011年第8期74-76,共3页 Medicine and Society
关键词 知情同意权 侵权责任法救济 Right of informed consent Relief of tort law
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1王泽鉴.侵权行为法[M].作者自版,台北,2009.
  • 2孟强.医疗损害责任[M].北京:法律出版社,2010.
  • 3(美)A.J.赫舍尔著 隗仁莲译.人是谁[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1994.34.
  • 4扬国荣.伦理与存在--道德哲学研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.23.
  • 5."Restructuring Informed Consent:Legal Therapy for the Doctor-Patient Relationship,"[].The Yale Law Journal.1970
  • 6.Chester v.Afshar[].All ER UKHL AC.
  • 7.Cruzan v.Director,MO.Health Dept[].LEdd.1990
  • 8.Maynard v.West Midlands RHA[].All ER.1985
  • 9.Sidaway v.Bethlehem Royal Hospital Governors[].AllER.1985
  • 10Margaret Brazier,Jose Miola."Bye-bye Bolam:A Medical Litigation Revolution,"[].Medial Law Review.2000

共引文献13

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部