摘要
目前医疗纠纷鉴定机构主要为医学会和司法鉴定机构,其鉴定的主体分别为医疗专家和法医,当前学术界对两类鉴定主体参与医疗纠纷司法鉴定有两种不同主张,有些主张由医学会进行医疗纠纷鉴定,有些主张由法医进行医疗纠纷鉴定,文章认为法医进行医疗纠纷鉴定有他的合理性,他在医疗纠纷的定位应为"专职的司法鉴定人、独立的诉讼参与人"。但是,法医作为鉴定人也存在一些问题和不足,文章针对现存的问题进行了分析,提出了相关的建议。
Now, identification structure of medical dispute are divided two parts: medical societies and expert testimony body. The main person of identification are medical experts and legal medical experts. The academic circles have two different views to this two parts which taking part in medical disputes identification. One supports that medical experts identify medical disputes, another supports that legal medical experts identify medical disputes. The article thinks that it has the reasonable of identifying by legal medical experts. Their position in the medical dispute should be "professional judicial experts, and independent litigants ". But it still has some problems and shortages. The article has analyzed the problems and put forward relevant suggestion.
出处
《卫生软科学》
2011年第8期549-551,共3页
Soft Science of Health
关键词
法医
医疗纠纷鉴定
定位
现状及问题
建议
legal medical experts medical disputes identification
position
current situation and problems
suggestions