期刊文献+

诸神相容之可能性?——宗教对话展开之症结与契机 被引量:1

The Possibility to Free Gods from Contesting?—The Cruxes and Opportunities to Carry out Interreligious Dialogues
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从亨廷顿的文明冲突论,到科尼尔所言宗教对话之不可能性,都显示了一种宗教在人们身上的根深蒂固性。然而,与宗教信仰相关的一系列事物对于信仰者的意义并非单纯,在某些方面宗教对话较易展开,而在其他方面却相对较难。人们对意义世界确定性的依赖和追求构成宗教对话的核心阻碍。但当代全球化形势下的宗教转型、信仰者的多元认同交叉和各种宗教对话理论的建构,为宗教对话障碍的消解提供了契机。 Claims such as Huntington's "clash of civilizations" and Catherine Cornille's impossibility of interreligious dialogue indicate that a religious belief can be deeply-rooted for believers. However, things related to one's religious belief do not make up a homogeneous block as far as their significance is concerned: some can be of core importance while others are peripheral. Interreligious dialogues are relatively easy at the peripheral level but difficult at the core level. Normally people tend to pursue and rely on the certainty of a world of meaning, which constitutes a pivotal barrier to interreligious dialogues. The recent globalization process, religious transformations, the overlapping of believers' multiple identities, and the construction of various interreligious dialogue theories, however, provide opportunities to free interreligious dialogues from many obstacles.
作者 郭慧玲
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期32-37,共6页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国际合作项目"公民认同建构中的宗教资源:中国信徒群体的比较研究"
关键词 宗教对话 具身性 认同 确定性 宗教转型 群际宽容 interreligious dialogue embodiment identity certainty religion transformation intergroup tolerance
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Berger P L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion[M]. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1967.
  • 2Taylor C. A Secular Age[M]. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007: 12.
  • 3Dillon M. 2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential Address Can Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences[J]. Sociology of Religion, 2010, 71(2): 139-156.
  • 4Huntington S P. The Clash of Civilizations[J]. Foreign Affairs, 1993, 72(3): 22-49.
  • 5D'Costa C. A Review of the Im-Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue by Catherine Cornille[J]. Reviews in Religion & Theology, 2009, 16(4): 557-558.
  • 6罗德尼·斯达克,罗杰尔·芬克.信仰的法则--解释宗教之人的方面[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
  • 7Grim B J, Finke R. Religious Persecution in Cross-National Context: Clashing Civilizations or Regulated Religious Economies?[J]. American Sociological Review, 2007, 72(4): 633-658.
  • 8Canetti D, Halperin E, Hobfoll S E, et al. Authoritarianism, Perceived Threat and Exclusionism on the Eve of the Disengagement: Evidence from Gaza[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2009, 33(6): 463-474.
  • 9Karpov V. Religiosity and Political Tolerance in Poland[J]. Sociology of Religion, 1999, 60(4): 387-402.
  • 10Yesilada B, Noordijk P, Webster C. Religiosity and Social Values of the Cypriots[J]. Social Compass, 2009, 56(1): 15-34.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[日]桑田六郎著 安幕陶译.明末清初之回儒[J].月华,(14).
  • 2陈垣.元西域人华化考[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000..
  • 3元史·食货志[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
  • 4纳忠.清代云南穆斯林对伊斯兰学问的教学与研究[A].清代中国伊斯兰教论集[C].银川:宁夏人民出版社,1981.
  • 5[法]阿米列罗舍.清季云南回民起义始末[A].曾觉之译.北京师范大学史学研究所.回族备征志:第一册[Z].1986.
  • 6白寿彝.马德新[J].中国穆斯林,1983,(4).
  • 7[英]林长宽 辛冬 姚继德译 云南省民族研究所.三位杰出的云南汉学伊斯兰学者[J].民族调查研究,1991,(1).
  • 8《新唐书·南诏传》,中华书局1975年出版.

同被引文献30

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部