摘要
利用文献资料研究法,通过分析我国农村集体土地所有权下主体和客体,研究了"有意的制度模糊"的农村集体土地所有权的带来的"利"和"弊"。指出"有意的制度模糊"一方面增强了土地产权的稳定性,给司法部门一定的灵活性,较好的避免了因土地体制转型带来的大规模的社会冲突,另一方面却反过来严重阻碍了土地登记的顺利的开展,为以后的农村土地流转和农村土地产权的保护设置了障碍。解决这一矛盾的唯一途径是早日还农村集体土地所有权一个清晰的定义。
Using the method of documentation and analyzing the principal part and the object of collective land ownership in China, this paper studies the advantages and disadvantages of "intentional institutionally ambiguous" collective land ownership, pointing out that such ambiguity enhances the stability of land tenure and prevents large scale social conflict due to transformation of land reform. On the other hand, this ambiguity seriously hinders land registration, transfer of collective land and transition of property rights etc. A clearer definition of collective land ownership is the only approach to resolving the contradiction.
出处
《国土资源科技管理》
2011年第4期109-113,共5页
Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources
关键词
农村集体土地
土地所有权
有意的制度模糊
rural collective land
ownership of land
intentional institutional ambiguity