期刊文献+

成本效益分析与代际公平:新代际折现思路 被引量:7

Cost-benefit Analysis and Intergenerational Equity:A New Intergenerational Discounting Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 成本效益分析在评价涉及长期资源环境影响的项目和政策时因损害代际公平而颇受批评,因此如何修正成本效益分析使其能够用于这类项目和政策的评价是研究的焦点。本文从可持续发展理论出发,首先比较分析经验代际折现率、零社会折现率、单一环境折现率和双重社会折现率四种当前具有代表性的代际折现率的提出背景、计算方法和运用范围,然后构建基于多重社会折现率的新代际折现思路,最后以水土保持项目为例,利用数字模拟方法验证了新代际折现思路的具体运用。结果表明:其一,与四种当前代表性的代际折现率相比,多重社会折现率在评价具有复杂环境影响的项目和政策上更具优势;其二,基于多重社会折现率的新代际折现思路能够为涉及长期资源环境影响的项目和政策评价提供系统的折现率选择指导;其三,多重社会折现率下的环境折现率遵循随着时间推移递减,随着人造资本与资源环境间替代难度的增大而递减的原则。最后文章从构建多领域专家参与平台和编制折现率查询表两个方面提供政策建议。 Becanse of the harm to intergenerational equity,cost-benefit analysis has been thought of as an invalid instrument for evaluating the projects and policies with long-term impacts on natural resources and environment.It,therefores is a research focus on how to adapt cost-benefit analysis to these projects and policies at present.From the perspective of sustainable development theory,the paper,first,conducts a comparative analysis of the background,calculation methods and application scopes of four sorts of representative intergenerational discount rates including experimentation-oriented intergenerational discount rate,zero social discount rate,unitary environmental discount rate and dual social discount rate.Then it establishes a new intergenerational discounting approach which centers on multi-social discount rate,and last,a new discounting approach is simulated in a numerical simulation way with an example of water and soil conservation project.It is concluded that:①multi-social discount rate is superior to the four sorts of representative intergenerational discount rates in terms of evaluating the projects and policies with long-term and complicated impacts on natural resources and environment;②the new intergenerational discounting approach centered on multi-social discount rate could provide systematic guidance to how to select discount rate in the evaluation process of projects and policies;③each environmental discount rate in the framework of multi-social discount rate must be estimated in accordance with the principle that it decreases in time span and in the difficulty of substitution between man-made capital and environmental resources.The paper ends up with the policy implication of establishing a stakeholder of multi-discipline experts and compiling a discount rate table.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期22-28,共7页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:7083300171003051)
关键词 资源环境 成本效益分析 代际公平 代际折现 resources and environment cost-benefit analysis intergenerational equity intergenerational discounting
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Baum S D. Description, Prescription and the Choice of Discount Rates [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69 : 197-205.
  • 2Arrow K J, Cline W, Maler K G, et al. Change [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996:125 -144.
  • 3Weitzman M. On the Environmental Discount Rate [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, 26:200-209.
  • 4Azar C, Sterner T. Discounting and Distributional Considerations in the Context of Global Wanning [ Jl- Ecological Economics, 1996, 19. 169-184.
  • 5张颖,任若恩,黄薇.中国代际内与代际间贴现率的实验研究[J].金融研究,2008(9):164-175. 被引量:23
  • 6Henderson N, Bateman I. Empirical and Public Choice Evidence for Hyperbolic Social Discount Rates and the Implications for Intergenerational Discounting [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1995, (5) : 413 -423.
  • 7Heal G. Valuing the Future: Economic Theory and Sustainability [ M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
  • 8Hepburn C. Concerning the Future: Declining Discount Rates and Intergenerational Equity [ D]. Oxford: Oxford University, 2005.
  • 9Frederick S, Loewenstein G, Donoghue T. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review [ J ]. Journal of Economics Literature, 2002, 40 (2) : 351 -401.
  • 10Shue H. Bequeathing Hazards: Security Rights and Property Rights of Future Humans [A]. In: Dare M H 1, Mount T D (Eds.). Global Environmental Economics: Equity and the Limits to Markets IMP. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.

二级参考文献25

  • 1龚六堂.贴现因子、偏好和行为经济学[J].财经问题研究,2004(8):3-9. 被引量:21
  • 2Arrow, K. J. , Cline, W. R. , Maler, K. -G. , Munasinghe, M. , Squitieri, R. , and Stiglitz, J. D. , 1996, "Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency", in Bruce, J. P. , Lee, H. , and Haites, E. F. (eds.), Climate Change 1995 - Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, UK Cambridge : Cambridge University Press: 125 - 144.
  • 3Baron, J. , 2001, "Can We Use Human Judgments to Determine the Discount Rate?", Risk Artalsysis, Vol. 20 : 861 - 868.
  • 4Benzion, U. , Rapoport, A. , and Yagil, J. , 1989, “Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions: An Experimental Study”, Management Science, Vol. 35 : 270 - 284.
  • 5Chen, L , Ding L , 2007, "A Study on Social Assessment in Construction Project of China", Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCom 2007) : 5491 -5494.
  • 6Cropper, M. L , Aydede, S. K. , and Portney, P. R. , 1991, "Discounting Human Lives". American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 73 : 469 -472.
  • 7Cropper, M. L. , Aydede, S. K. , and Portney, P. R. , 1992, "Rates of Time Preference for Saving Lives", American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 82:469 -472.
  • 8Cropper, M. L , Aydede, S. K. , and Portney, P. R. , 1994, “Preferences for Live Saving Programs: How the Public Discounts Time and Age”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 8:243 -265.
  • 9Chapman, G. B. , 2000, "Preferences for Improving And Declining Sequences of Health Outcomes", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 13:203 -18.
  • 10Cowen, T. and Parfit, D. , 1992, "Against the Social Discount Rate", in Fishkin J. , Laslett P. (eds.), Justice between Age Groups and Generations, New Haven: Yale University Press: 144 - 161.

共引文献31

同被引文献87

引证文献7

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部