期刊文献+

基于Bayesian-Copula方法的商业银行操作风险度量 被引量:16

Measurement of Operational Risk in Commercial Bank Based on Bayesian-Copula Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在对损失分布法分析的基础上,将损失事件划分为内部欺诈、外部欺诈以及违规执行三种类型;引用两阶段分布拟合操作风险的损失强度分布,同时采用贝叶斯理论中的吉布斯抽样来获取参数估计值以减小低频率高损失数据不足带来的误差;考虑到操作风险各损失事件间可能存在的相关性,本文采用Copula函数对操作风险进行整合以获得联合损失分布函数,并计算出不同置信水平下我国商业银行操作风险损失的VaR值与CVaR值。实证研究的结果表明:基于贝叶斯理论的参数估计综合考虑了总体与样本等先验信息,估计出的参数值误差较小;Copula函数的引入与VaR值、CVaR值的测算,能在考虑了损失事件发生概率的同时,估测出操作风险潜在的损失大小,从而可以更准确度量操作风险。 Based on the analysis of loss distribution approach,loss events are divided into three types: internal fraud,external fraud and illegal operation.Then,we apply two-stage distribution to fit the loss intensity distribution of operational risk and use Gibbs sampling of Bayesian theory to obtain the parameter estimates,which can reduce error caused by the insufficient low-frequency and high-loss data.In view of the correlation between different types of operational risk loss,the copula function is applied to integrate the total loss distribution.Finally,we calculate VaR and CVaR for different confidence level of the operational risk of commercial banks in China.The empirical result shows that: Parameter estimation based on Bayesian theory takes into account a priori information such as population and sample information which can reduce the estimated error.The introduced copula function and measured value of VaR and CVaR not only consider the probability of loss events,but also can calculate potential losses of operational risk,so it can get a more accurate measurement result of operational risk.
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期17-25,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金委创新群体科学研究基金项目(70921001) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(70973145 70771114) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词 操作风险 贝叶斯理论 损失分布 COPULA operational risk bayesian sampling loss distribution approach copula
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Third consultative paper on the New Basel Capital Accord Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland[N], 2003 - 07 - 30.
  • 2Wilson, D.. VaR in operation [J]. Risk, 1995, 8(2): 24-25.
  • 3Medova, E. , Kyriacou, M.. Extreme values and the measurement of operational risk[J].Operational Risk, 2000, 1(8): 12-15.
  • 4Alexander,M.. Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2000, 11(7):271-300.
  • 5Alexander, C.. Operational Risk: Regulation, Analysis and Management[M]. Prentice Hall, London, 2003.
  • 6Fontnouvelle, D. , Rosengren, E.. Implications of alternative operational risk modeling techniques [Z]. Working paper, Federal Reserv Bank of Boston, 2004.
  • 7Mittnik, S. Modeling dependencies in operational risk with Hybrid Bayesian Networks [J]. Methodology Compute Apply Probably, 2007.
  • 8Neil, M. , Hager, D.. Modeling operational risk in financial institutions using hybrid dynamic Bayesian net works [J]. The Journal of Operational Risk, 2009,4 (1):3-33.
  • 9巴曙松.巴塞尔新资本协议框架下的操作风险衡量与资本金约束[J].经济理论与经济管理,2003,23(2):17-24. 被引量:93
  • 10樊欣,杨晓光.操作风险度量:国内两家股份制商业银行的实证分析[J].系统工程,2004,22(5):44-48. 被引量:60

二级参考文献65

共引文献197

同被引文献168

引证文献16

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部