期刊文献+

中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ:简式版的制定及信效度检验 被引量:321

Development of the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory(CBF-PI) Ⅲ:Psychometric Properties of CBF-PI Brief Version
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:在中国大五人格问卷(CBF-PI)的基础上编制中国大五人格问卷简式版(Chinese Big Five PersonalityInventory brief version,CBF-PI-B)。方法:从CBF-PI中抽取部分条目组成测量大五人格维度的简式量表。结果:①CBF-PI-B含有40个条目,每个维度分别由8个条目测量;②简式版量表各维度具有较好的信度系数,内部一致性系数在0.764(宜人性)~0.814(神经质)之间,平均0.793;间隔10周的重测系数在0.672(宜人性)~0.811(开放性)之间,平均0.742。③简式版五因子结构较为清晰共可解释总方差变异的43.49%,各因子与完整版量表对应因子的相关均在0.85以上;各因子与NEO-PI-R对应因子间的相关在0.358(A)到0.846(C)之间;各因子与BFI对应因子间的相关在0.584(宜人性)到0.826(神经质)之间,相关系数均在0.01水平上显著。结论:CBF-PI-B具有较好的信效度,可用于相关研究。 Objective: The present study aimed to create a brief inventory(CBF-PI-B) to assess the five dimensions based on Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory(CBF-PI).Methods: A set of good items were extracted from CBF-PI to form a brief scale.A total of 1221 college students were administered the CBF-PI.Other two samples including 54 and 53 college students completed both CBF-PI and NEO-PI-R or BFI,respectively.Results: ①CBF-PI-B included 40 items,which had good psychometric properties.Internal consistency reliabilities(Coefficient Alphas) of the CBF-PI-B ranging from 0.764(A) to 0.814(N);the mean was 0.793.②The test-retest reliabilities 10 weeks after were also excellent,ranging from 0.672(A) to 0.811(O);the mean was 0.742.③The CBF-PI brief version had clear factor structure.All items loaded above 0.40 on their intended factor.Five factors explained 43.49% of the total variance,and the variance explained by each factor at the same level,ranging from 8.16% to 9.15%.Equivalence coefficients between the CBF-PI and CBF-PI-B were above 0.85.④The factors of CBF-PI-B correlated strongly with relevant dimensions of NEO-PI-R and BFI,ranging from 0.358(A) to 0.846(C) and 0.584(A) to 0.826(N),respectively.Conclusion: CBF-PI-B has good psychometric properties,which could be employed to relevant research.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2011年第4期454-457,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 大五模型 中国大五人格问卷 信效度 问卷编制 简式版 Big five model Chinese big five personality inventory Questionnaire development Psychometric properties
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the inte- grative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.
  • 2Burisch M. You don't always get what you pay for: Measur- ing depression with short and simple versus long and so- phisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984, 18:81-98.
  • 3John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. The big five inventory- versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.
  • 4Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 2007, 41: 203-212.
  • 5王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥.中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅰ:理论框架与信度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(5):545-548. 被引量:81
  • 6王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥.中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅱ:效度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(6):687-690. 被引量:28
  • 7戴晓阳,姚树桥,蔡太生,杨坚.NEO个性问卷修订本在中国的应用研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(3):171-174. 被引量:77
  • 8戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 9Benet-Martinez V, John OP. Los Cinco Grandes across cul- tures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-muhimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75:729-750.
  • 10Robins RW, Tracy JL, Trzesniewski KH, Potter J, et al.Per- sonality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 2001,35:463-482.

二级参考文献54

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2龚耀先.修订艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南医学院,1986..
  • 3周榕 陈红 杨炳钧 等译 PervinLA 著.人格科学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2001..
  • 4Anastasi A,Urbina S. Psychological testing(7th Ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, 1997. 121-138.
  • 5Smith GT,McCarthy DM. Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 1995,7(3) : 300-308.
  • 6Fabrigar LR,Wegener DT,MacCaUum RC,et al. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychology Methods, 1999,4(3) : 272-299.
  • 7曹亦薇译.芝祐顺著.因素分析法.北京:人民教育出版社.1999.151.
  • 8Streiner DL. Figuring out factors:The use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1994,39 : 135-140.
  • 9John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA.Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3th). New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.
  • 10John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.

共引文献193

同被引文献2947

引证文献321

二级引证文献1568

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部