期刊文献+

个体特质推论与行为推论的性别差异 被引量:3

Gender Differences in Characteristics of Trait Inferences and Behavior Inferences
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨个体特质推论与行为推论的性别差异。方法:采用Maass等人提出的反应时研究范式对30名男大学生和34名女大学生进行实验研究。结果:①就信息再认正确率而言,男生对特质词的反应显著低于女生(P<0.001);②男生对特质词和行为信息的反应时均显著高于女生(P<0.001);③男生特质推论数量显著低于女生(P<0.001);④在反应时上,男生特质推论显著高于女生(P<0.001)。结论:在特质推论方面女生好于男生,行为推论上二者没有差异。 Objective: To explore the gender differences in characteristics of trait inferences and behavior inferences.Methods: The experiment which used Maass' paradigm was carried out in 30 male and 34 female college students.Results: ①Male subjects' recognition accuracy of trait word was lower than female subjects'(P0.001).②Male subjects' reaction time of trait word and behavior information was longer than female subjects'(P0.001).③Male subjects' trait inferences were less than female subjects'(P0.001).④Male subjects' reaction time of trait inferences was longer than female's(P0.001).Conclusion: Females are better at trait inference than male,but there is no significant gender difference in behavior inference.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2011年第4期499-502,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 新乡医学院2009年第七批省级重点学科开放课题(ZD200973) 河南省教育厅资助项目(2010-QN-119)
关键词 性别差异 特质推论 行为推论 Gender Differences Trait Inferences Behavior Inferences
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献147

共引文献44

同被引文献31

  • 1Ferreira MB, Garcia-Marques L, Hamilton D, et al. On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intention?al inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48: 1-12.
  • 2Boseovski JJ, Lee K. Seeing the world through rose-colored glasses? Neglect of consensus information in young child?ren 's personality judgments. Social Development, 2008, 17 (2): 399-4165.
  • 3Wigboldus DHJ, Dijksterhuis A, Knippenberg VA. When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype?inconsistent inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84: 470-484.
  • 4Fiske, ST, Neuberg, SL, Beattie, AE, et a1. Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Jou?rnal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1987,23: 399-427.
  • 5Kelley HH. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1973,28: 107-128.
  • 6Yan XM, Wang MF, Zhang Q. Effects of gender stereotypes on spontaneous trait inferences and the moderating role of gender schematicity: Evidence from Chinese undergradu?ates. Social Cognition, 2012, 30(2): 218-230.
  • 7Zhang J, Norvilitis JM, Jin S. Measuring gender orientation with the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Chinese Culture. Sex Roles, 2001,44: 237-251.
  • 8Bem SL. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing source. Psychological Review, 1981, 88: 354-364.
  • 9Sherman JW, Lee AY, Bessenoff GR, et al. A. Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognit?ive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 70(3): 589-606.
  • 10Srull TK, Lichtenstein M, Rothbart M. Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Exp?erimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1985, 11: 316-345.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部