期刊文献+

论两晋礼家关于立宗资格的分歧

On Ritual Scientists Discussion about the Right to Create Clan in Jin Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以杜预为代表的礼家认为有资格立大宗者仅为太子之母弟一人,而以贺循为代表的礼家则认为受封之群公子及起于是邦为大夫者皆可立大宗。杜预之说将礼文"公子之宗道"与一般卿大夫立宗之原则等而视之并受到了王肃之学的影响,而贺氏之说则明显受到了郑玄之学的影响。在两晋立宗资格问题上,由主杜预之说到主贺氏之说,反映出了两晋学术传统与学风的转变。 DuYu, as the representative of some Ritual scientists in Jin dynasty hold that only the king's second eldest son has the right to create clan, this viewpoint formed because of WangSu's influence and confusing of the principle in foundation of the clan between the prince's clan and DaFu's elan. While HeXun and others insist that all of the king's sons except the crown Prince and every body knighted as DaFu in this kingdom have the right to be the ancestor of the clan. This viewpoint was influenced by ZhengXuan' s thoughts. The discussion about the right to create clan in Jin dynasty has practical significance. Besides, we can spy on the tendency about the thoughts of ritual study in Jin dynasty roughly form it.
作者 邹远志
出处 《齐鲁师范学院学报》 2011年第4期91-95,共5页 Journal of Qilu Normal University
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目"两晋议礼与社会文化的互动"(10C0897)的阶段性成果
关键词 立宗 别子 公子之宗道 郑王之学 The right of creation of clan The son except crown prince The prince's clan The schools of ZhengXuan and WangSu
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1杨天宇.略论“礼是郑学”[J].齐鲁学刊,2002(3):90-95. 被引量:6
  • 2(清)马国翰.玉函山房辑佚书[M]广陵书社,2004.
  • 3(唐)杜 佑撰,王文锦等.通典[M]中华书局,1988.

二级参考文献8

  • 1陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 2魏征等.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
  • 3刘昫等.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
  • 4黄侃.礼学略说[A].黄侃论学杂著[C].上海:上海古籍出版社出版,1980.
  • 5皮锡瑞.经学历史:卷五[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 6杜佑.通典[M].《十通》本.
  • 7陈澧.东塾读书记:卷一四[M].北京:三联书店,1998.
  • 8房玄龄等.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1987.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部