期刊文献+

双髋骨质疏松的差别与髋部骨折的相关性分析 被引量:2

The correlation between different osteoporosis status of bilateral hip and the hip fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双侧髋部骨质疏松程度的差别与髋部骨折发生之间的关系,为防治骨质疏松性骨折提供参考依据。方法选取骨质疏松髋部骨折患者108例,平均年龄79.4岁,对其分别测定骨折侧和对侧髋部的Singh指数和股骨上段皮质厚度。结果骨折侧的Singh指数平均为2.87±1.08,对照侧则为3.47±1.02,两者相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。股骨上段皮质厚度骨折侧平均为0.59±0.16,对照侧为0.69±0.13,两者相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论髋部骨折往往发生在两侧髋部骨质疏松程度较为严重的一侧,故对比双髋的Singh指数和皮质骨厚度可以提高髋部骨折危险性的预测,同时在治疗上可以给予针对性的措施,以防止骨折的发生。 Objective To discuss the correlation between different osteoporosis status of bilateral hip and hip fractures, and to provide referential evidence for the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Methods One hundred and eight patients with osteoporotic hip fractures were included, with an average age of 79.4 years old. Singh indexes were assessed and cortical thickness of the proximal femur was measured at the fracture side and the opposite side of the hip. Results The average Singh index was 2.87 ±1.08 at the fracture side, and 3.47 ± 1.02 at the control side. The difference between the two was significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The average cortical thickness of the proximal femur was 0.59 ± 0.16 at the fracture side, and 0.69 ±0. 13 at the control side. The difference between the two was significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Hip fractures occurs most likely at the side with more severe osteoporosis. Therefore comparison of Singh index and cortical thickness of the bilateral hip can promote the risk prediction of the hip fracture. Meanwhile, corresponsive treatment can be provided to prevent the occurrence of hip fractures.
出处 《中国骨质疏松杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第8期680-682,共3页 Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis
关键词 骨质疏松 髋部骨折 双侧对比 预测评估 Osteoporosis Hip fracture Bilateral comparison Evaluate
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Davirson CW, Merrilees MJ, Wilkinson TJ, et al. Hip fracture mortality and morbidity can we do better. N Z Med J,2001,114: 329.
  • 2Black DM, Cummings SR, Melton LJ 3rd. Appondicular bone mineral and a woman's lifetime risk of hipfracture. J Bone Miner Res, 1992,7 ( 6 ) : 639-646.
  • 3Singh M, Nagrath AR,Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1970, 51:457-467.
  • 4The NIH Consensus Development Panel Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. JAMA, 2001, 285 : 785- 795.
  • 5Wilkins CH, Birge SJ. Prevention of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Am J Med ,2005,118 ( 11 ) : 1190-1195.
  • 6张志强,沈铁城.髋部骨折相关病因的研究进展[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2006,12(6):639-642. 被引量:6
  • 7Riggs BI, Melton LJ I Ⅲ. The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med, 1992,327:620-627.
  • 8Melton IJ Ⅲ, Kan SH, Wahner HW,et al. Lifetime fracture risk : an approach to hip fracture risk assessment based on bone mineral density and age. J Clkin Epidemiol,1988,41:985-994.
  • 9方世明,薛杰,钱朝霞,沈海根.Singh指数法的临床应用探讨[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2001,7(3):193-193. 被引量:16
  • 10Miehelotti J, Clark J. Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res, 1999,14 : 1714-1720.

二级参考文献46

  • 1高启忠,宋冠军.87例老年性脊椎性骨质疏松症骨密度X线测量[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1999,5(4):33-34. 被引量:1
  • 2中国人原发性骨质疏松症诊断标准(试行)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1999,5(F03):1-3. 被引量:325
  • 3Michelotti J,J Bone Miner Res,1999年,14卷,1714页
  • 4刘忠厚,中国骨质疏松杂志,1999年,5卷,1页
  • 5Karlsson K M,Bone,1996年,18卷,327页
  • 6Faulkner K G,Calcif Tissue Int,1995年,56卷,26页
  • 7Rubin P J,J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1992年,74卷,28页
  • 8Sedrine WB,Chevallier T,Zegals B,et al.Development and assessment of the osteoporosis index of risk (OSIRS) to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.Gynecol Endocrinol,2002,16(3):245-250.
  • 9Johnell O,Kanis JA,Oden A.Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.J Bone Miner Res,2005,20(7):1185-1194.
  • 10Nguyen TV,Pocock N,Eisman JA.Interpretation of bone mineral density measurement and its change.J Clin Densitom,2000,3:107-119.

共引文献63

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部