期刊文献+

基于均匀设计法的碳纳米管纳米流体稳定性 被引量:3

Carbon nanotube nanofluid's stability with uniform design method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究碳纳米管质量分数、分散剂质量分数、pH值和超声振荡时间对碳纳米管纳米流体稳定性的交互影响和定量影响.配置12个碳纳米管纳米流体样品,测定各样品的Zeta电位值.样品的4因素取值通过均匀设计法确定,稳定性用Zeta电位表征.采用二次多项式逐步回归法处理数据,建立碳纳米管纳米流体稳定性与4个因素之间的回归模型.由模型分析可知,该4因素对碳纳米管纳米流体稳定性的影响是相互约束的.当超声振荡时间>3.411 h时,碳纳米管纳米流体的稳定性与碳纳米管质量分数正相关;当超声振荡时间<3.411 h时,碳纳米管纳米流体的稳定性与碳纳米管质量分数负相关. The interactional and quantitative influences of four factors,mass fraction of carbon nanotube,mass fraction of dispersant,pH value and ultrasonic vibration time,on the stability of carbon nanotube nanofluid were analyzed.Twelve specific sample nanofluids were prepared and their Zeta potentials were measured.Sample values were determined by uniform design method and the stability was evaluated by Zeta potential.The quadratic polynomial stepwise regressive method was applied to data-processing;and a regression model between the nanofluid's stability and four influence factors was established.Results showed that one factor's influence on nanofluid's stability was restrained by others.When ultrasonic vibration time was more than 3.411 hours,the stability of the nanofluid was positively correlated to the mass fraction of carbon nanotube;while ultrasonic vibration time was less than 3.411 hours,it was negatively correlated.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期1254-1258,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50706044) 国家"863"高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2007AA05Z254)
关键词 碳纳米管纳米流体 分散性稳定性 影响稳定性的因素 均匀设计法 回归模型 carbon nanotube nanofluid dispersion stability factors influencing stability uniform design method regression model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献78

共引文献93

同被引文献23

  • 1梅松华,盛谦,冯夏庭.均匀设计在岩土工程中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(16):2694-2697. 被引量:37
  • 2何本贵,高谦,刘芳.公路路堑边坡稳定性影响因素正交分析与数值模拟[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(6):716-719. 被引量:33
  • 3张健,孙巧根,长铮.基于正交试验的方法分析边坡稳定性影响因素的显著性[J].中外公路,2005,25(5):8-11. 被引量:15
  • 4LAM W, I.O H P. Accuracy of O-D estimates from traffic counts [J]. Traffic Engineering and Control, 1990, 31(6) : 358 - 367.
  • 5YANG H, IIDIA Y, SASAKI T. An analysis of the re- liability of an origin-destination trip matrix estimated from traffic counts[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1991, 25(5): 351-363.
  • 6YANG H, ZHOU J. Optimal traffic counting locations for origin-destination matrix estimation[J]. Transporta- tion Research Part B, 1998, 32(2) : 109 - 126.
  • 7BIANCO L, CONFESSORE G, REVERBERI P. A network based model for traffic sensor location with im- plications on O/D matrix estimates[J]. Transportation Science, 2001, 35(1) : 50 - 60.
  • 8YANG H, YANG C, GAN L. Models and algorithms for the screen line-based traffic-counting location prob- lems[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2006, 33 (3) : 836 - 858.
  • 9MINGUEZ R, SANCHEZ-CAMBRONERO C S, CA- STILLO E, et al. Optimal traffic plate scanning location for OD trip matrix and route estimation in road net- works[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2010, 44 (2) : 282- 298.
  • 10CASTILLO E, MENENDEZ J M, SANCHEZ C S. Pre- dicting traffic flow using Bayesian networks[J]. Transporta- tion Research Part B, 2008, 42(5) : 482 - 509.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部