期刊文献+

急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心电图ST段回落程度与预后的观察 被引量:4

Prognostic value of ST-segment resolution after percutaneous coronary intervention in the patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后心电图ST段的回落程度与预后的关系。方法:入选225例患者,其中急性前壁梗死118例,非前壁心肌梗死107例。依据PCI后心电图ST段抬高总和与总回落百分比(sumSTR)将全部患者分为sumSTR>70%组(完全回落组)、30%<sum-STR≤70%组(部分回落组)及sumSTR≤30%组(未回落组),并对这3组患者的住院期间左室射血分数及6个月内总的主要心血管事件(MACE,包括心绞痛、再发心肌梗死、因心血管事件再入院、心力衰竭和死亡等)发生率的相关性进行对比分析。另外,对可能影响随访期间MACE发生的因素进行多因素回归分析。结果:完全回落组住院期间的左室射血分数[(56.62±7.53)%]较部分回落组[(53.4±9.45)%]及未回落组[(54.3±8.66)%]显著升高,均P<0.05;完全回落组6个月内MACE发生率(16.3%)显著低于部分回落组(39.3%)和未回落组(48.3%),均P<0.01。Logistic多因素回归分析提示前壁心肌梗死、sumSTR是随访6个月内MACE发生率的独立预测因子。结论:sumSTR与患者住院期间左室射血分数、6个月内MACE发生率相关;前壁心肌梗死、sumSTR是随访6个月内MACE发生率的独立预测因子。 Objective:This article was undertaken to investigate the relationship between the prognosis and the amount of ST segments resolution in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Method:Total of 225 cases of patients were divided into three groups according to sum of the relative ST-segments resolution(sumSTR): sumSTR70%(complete resolution group),30%sumSTR≤70%(partial resolution group) and sumSTR≤30%(no resolution group).The values of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) by UCG during hospitalization and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events(MACE) at 6 months post PCI were compared and analysed.In addition,multi-factor regression analysis was used to identify the factors that may affect major adverse cardiovascular events in the follow-up period. Result:Two hundred and twenty five patients aged 61.3±12.7 were enrolled in this retrospective study,in which 156 were male,one hundred and eighteen patients had acute anterior infarction,and one hundred and seven had non-acute anterior infarction.Seventy patients had major adverse cardiovascular events in the follow-up period.Patients with sumSTR70% had higher values of LVEF compared to patients with 30%sumSTR≤70%(56.62±7.53 vs 53.4±9.45,P=0.022) and patents with sumSTR≤30%(56.62±7.53 vs 54.3±8.66,P=0.049,P=0.022).The incidence of MACE at 6 months post PCI was lower in the patients with sumSTR70% compared to patients with 30%sumSTR≤70%(16.3% vs 39.3%,P=0.001) and patients with sumSTR≤30%(16.3% vs 48.3%,P=0.001).Multivariate regression analysis showed that anterior infarction and poor sumSTR were independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in 6 months follow up. Conclusion:This study show that amounts of sumSTR post primary PCI was closely correlated with the values of LVEF and incidence of MACE in the patients with STEMI.Anterior infarction and poor sumSTR were independent predictors of 6 months major adverse cardiovascular events in the same patients.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期597-599,共3页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 心肌梗死 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 ST段回落 myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention ST segment resolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1杨跃进,赵京林.2004年ACC/AHA ST段抬高急性心肌梗死治疗指南评介[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(12):907-910. 被引量:16
  • 2DE LEMOS J A,ANTMAN E M,GIBSON M,et al.Abciximab improves both epicardial flow and myocardial reperfusion in ST elevation myocardial infarction:observations from the TIMI-14 trial[J].Circulation,2000,201:239-243.
  • 3CLAEYS M J,BOSMANS J,VEENSTRA L,et al.Determinants and prognostic implications of persistent ST-segment elevation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:importance of microvascular reperfusion injury on clinical outcome[J].Circulation,1999;99:1972-1977.
  • 4DE LEMOS J A,BRAUNWALD E,BRAUNWALD E.ST segment resolution as a tool for assessing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,38:1283-1294.
  • 5LEE A K,SADICK N,NG A,et al.Prognostic implication of ST-segment resolution following primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction[J].Inter Med J,2004,34:551-556.
  • 6DE LUCA G,ARTHUR C M,SURYAPRANATA H,et al,Prognostic significance of residual cumulative ST-segment deviation after mechanical reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].Am Heart J,2005,150:1248-1254.
  • 7杨跃进.冠心病介入治疗进展(13) 急性心肌梗死的理想再灌注治疗[J].中国循环杂志,2003,18(6):405-408. 被引量:14
  • 8SANTORO G M,ANTONIUCCI D,VALENTI R,et al.Rapid reduction of ST-segment elevation after successful direct angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,1997,80:685-689.
  • 9VAN'T HOF A W J,LIEM A,DE BOER M J,et al.Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction[J].Lancet,1997,350:615-619.
  • 10MATEZKY S,NOVIKOV M,GRUBERG L,et al.The significance of persistent ST elevation versus early resolution of ST segment elevation after primary PTCA[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1999;34:1932-1938.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Antman EM,Anbe DT,Armstrong PW,et al.ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction:A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice(Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction)[J].J Am Coil Cardiol,2004,44:12-211.
  • 2Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials[J].Lancet,2003,361:13-20.
  • 3Melandri G.The obsession with primary angioplasty[J].Circulation,2003,108:1620.
  • 4Rogers WJ,Dean LS,Moore PB,et al.For the Alabama Registry of Myocardial Ischemia Investigators.Comparison of primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,1994,74:111-118.
  • 5Patrono C,Bachmann F,Baigent C,et al.ESC expert consensus document on the use of antiplatelet agents:a report by the task force on the use of antiplatelet agents in patients with atheroselerotic cardiovascular disease of the European Society of Cardiology[J].Eur Heart J,2004,25:1662-1681.
  • 6Stone GW,Grines CL,Cox DA,et al.For the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC)Investigators.Comparison of angioplasty with stenting.with or without abeiximab,in acute myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346:957-966.
  • 7Montalescot G,Barragan P,Wittenberg O,et al.For the ADMIRAL (Abeiximab before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long-Term Follow-up).Investigators.Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,2001,344:1895-1903.
  • 8Collins R,Peto R,Baigent C,et al.Aspirin,heparin,and fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,1997,336:847-860.
  • 9The TIMI Study Group.Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction:results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction(TIMI)phase Ⅱ trial[J].N Engl J Med,1989,320:618-627.
  • 10Ambrosioni E,Borghi C,Magnani B,et al.The effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on mortality and morbidity after anteriormyoeardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,1995.332:80-85.

共引文献27

同被引文献47

  • 1夏勇,杨煜,李东野,李雷,李先进,张勇,陈清枝.急性冠状动脉病变后微循环障碍发生时限及预处理对其影响[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2005,14(2):127-131. 被引量:1
  • 2CAVUSOGLU E, CHOPRA V, GUPTA A, et al. Relation between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and all-cause mortality at two years in an un selected population referred for coronary angiography [J]. Int J Cardiol , 2010 ,141:141-146.
  • 3PERLSTEIN T S, WEUVE J, PFEFER M A, et al. Red blood cell distribution width and mortality risk in a community based prospective cohort[J]. Arch In- tern Med,2009,169:588-594.
  • 4PASCUAL-FIGAL D A, BONAQUE J C, REDON- DO B, et al. Red blood cell distribution width pre- dicts long-term outcome regardless of anaemia status in acute heart failure patients[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2009,11:840-846.
  • 5FELKER G M, ALLEN L A, POCOCK S J, et al. Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Pro- gram and the Duke Databank[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2007,50:40-47.
  • 6TONELLI M, SACKS F, ARNOLD M, et al. Rela- tion between red blood cell distribution width and car diovascular event rate in people with coronary disease [J]. Circulation, 2008,117:163- 168.
  • 7DEVARA.I S, KUMARESAN P R, JIALAL I. C-re- active protein induces release o{ both endothelial mi croparticles and circulating endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo: further evidence of endothelial dysfunc- tion[J]. ClinChem,2011,57:1757-1761.
  • 8ALI.EN L A, FELKER G M, MEHRA M R, et al. Validation and potential mechanisms of red cell distri- bution width as a prognostic marker in heart failure [J]. J CardFail,2010,16=230-238.
  • 9DZIEWIERZ A, SIUDAK Z, RAKOWSKI T, et al. Age-related differences in treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in unselected cohort of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction trans- ferred for primary angioplasty[J]. J Thromb Throm- bolysis,2012,34:214-221.
  • 10Brodie BR,Stuckey TD,Hansen C,et al.Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2005,95(3):343-348.

引证文献4

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部